Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison

被引:98
作者
Kenney, Martin [1 ]
Patton, Donald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Human & Community Dev, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Bayh-Dole Act; Inventor ownership; University technology licensing; Entrepreneurship; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; SPIN-OFFS; FIRMS; KNOWLEDGE; CREATION; COMMERCIALIZATION; INSTITUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; SPILLOVERS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines whether university ownership of inventions made by its personnel best serves the widely held social goals of encouraging technology commercialization and entrepreneurship. Using a hand-collected census of technology-based university spin-offs from six universities, one of which is the University of Waterloo and the only inventor ownership university in North America, we compare the number and type of spin-offs produced by these universities. We find suggestive evidence that inventor ownership universities can be more efficient in generating spin-offs on both per faculty and per R&D dollar expended perspective. We find that the field of computer sciences and electrical engineering generates a greater number of spin-offs than do our other two categories - the biomedical sciences, and the field of engineering and the physical sciences. In general, our results demonstrate that inventor ownership can be extremely productive of spin-offs. From these results, we suggest that governments seeking to encourage university invention commercialization and entrepreneurship should experiment with an inventor ownership system. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1112
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [21] Colapinto C, 2007, INT REV EC, V54, P319
  • [22] How do university inventions get into practice?
    Colyvas, J
    Crow, M
    Gelijns, A
    Mazzoleni, R
    Nelson, RR
    Rosenberg, N
    Sampat, BN
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) : 61 - 72
  • [23] Cyert R. M., 1992, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1177/01492063231194968
  • [24] A SOCIAL-MOVEMENT PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE-CONTROL
    DAVIS, GF
    THOMPSON, TA
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1994, 39 (01) : 141 - 173
  • [25] Shirking, sharing risk and shelving: The role of university license contracts
    Dechenaux, Emmanuel
    Thursby, Marie
    Thursby, Jerry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2009, 27 (01) : 80 - 91
  • [26] Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?
    Di Gregorio, D
    Shane, S
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) : 209 - 227
  • [27] Doutriaux J., 2003, Local Economy, V18, P63, DOI [10.1080/0269094032000073843, DOI 10.1080/0269094032000073843]
  • [28] Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities
    Feldman, M
    Feller, I
    Bercovitz, J
    Burton, R
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) : 105 - 121
  • [29] FINI R, RES POLICY IN PRESS
  • [30] Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia
    Fini, Riccardo
    Lacetera, Nicola
    Shane, Scott
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (08) : 1060 - 1069