Formal Verification of SDN-Based Firewalls by Using TLA&x002B;

被引:8
作者
Kim, Young-Mi [1 ]
Kang, Miyoung [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Comp & Radio Commun Engn, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Grad Sch Informat Secur, Seoul 02841, South Korea
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2020年 / 8卷 / 08期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Tools; Network topology; Topology; Model checking; Firewalls (computing); Scalability; Companies; Firewall; formal methods; software-defined networking; TLA plus; PROCESS ALGEBRAIC APPROACH; SPECIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979894
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software-defined networking (SDN) has generated increased interest due to the rapid growth in the amount of data generated by the development of the Internet and communications, the commercialization of 5G, and increasingly complex networks. While SDN is more advantageous than traditional networks in terms of efficient network management, rapid deployment, and dynamic scalability, the correctness of a network configuration must be ensured in advance. In other words, SDN components such as network devices, SDN controllers, and applications need to be deployed correctly and must be free of rule conflicts, particularly between various application policies; otherwise, it may result in network paralysis in the worst case. This paper assumes that the SDN network is free of rule conflicts when the rules in the SDN switches correctly obey firewall application or policies. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a verification framework for SDN using TLA & x002B;. We show that the firewall rule behavior of switches can be formalized using TLA & x002B;, and this is verified with the TLC model checker that uses TLA & x002B; as the model description language. We check two different types of topology models through our verification framework to ensure that the same firewall rules are maintained even if the topology changes. The findings show that the firewall rules may be inconsistent as the topology changes.
引用
收藏
页码:52100 / 52112
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NSDI 12 9 USENIX S N
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Openflow switch specification (version 1.5.1)
[7]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Specifying Systems: The TLA+ Language and Tools for Hardware and Software Engineers
[9]   A process algebraic approach to the schedulability analysis of real-time systems [J].
Ben-Abdallah, H ;
Choi, JY ;
Clarke, D .
REAL-TIME SYSTEMS, 1998, 15 (03) :189-219
[10]  
El-Hassany A, 2016, ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, V51, P402, DOI [10.1145/2980983.2908124, 10.1145/2908080.2908124]