Breast magnetic resonance imaging for estimation of the tumour extent in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ: Comparison between full diagnostic and abbreviated protocols

被引:11
|
作者
Shiraishi, Megumi [1 ]
Igarashi, Takao [1 ]
Terayama, Tomomi [1 ]
Watanabe, Ken [1 ]
Ashida, Hirokazu [1 ]
Ojiri, Hiroya [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Minato Ku, 3-25-8 Nishi Shimbashi, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Breast; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER; ENHANCEMENT; ACCURACY; REVEALS; PATTERN; LESIONS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108788
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the rate of concordance between pathology and preoperative breast MRI performed with an abbreviated protocol (AP) or a full diagnostic protocol (FDP) for estimation of the tumour extent in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods: This retrospective study included 164 patients with pathologically proven DCIS who underwent preoperative breast MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the tumour extent on MRI with (FDP) and without the delayed phase (AP) and compared the readings with the pathological tumour extent. The background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and morphology were also evaluated. Furthermore, the influence of the degree of BPE, presence or absence of B2 and B3 lesions, and pathological DCIS grade on the accuracy of MRI findings was assessed. Concordance between MRI and pathology was evaluated using correlation analysis. Results: Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the concordance between MRI and pathology were 0.63 (reader 1) and 0.69 (reader 2) with AP and 0.65 and 0.73 (readers 1 and 2, respectively) with FDP. For both readers, the difference in the measured value between FDP and pathology was significantly smaller than that between AP and pathology (p < 0.001). The inter-reader variation in the measured tumour extent was larger with FDP than with AP. The presence of B3 lesions, low-grade DCIS, and moderate/marked BPE lowered the rate of concordance between MRI and pathology. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that preoperative MRI with FDP is more accurate than that with AP alone for estimation of the tumour extent in patients with pure DCIS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology
    Badan, Gustavo Machado
    Roveda Junior, Decio
    Paito, Sebastiao
    Castro Fleury, Eduardo de Faria
    Maragno, Bianca
    Dantas do Amaral Campos, Mario Sergio
    Pecci Ferreira, Carlos Alberto
    Trocoli Ferreira, Felipe Augusto
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 62 (05): : 421 - 427
  • [2] The Role of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Nadrljanski, Mirjan
    Milosevic, Zorica
    Plesinac-Karapandzic, Vesna
    Goldner, Branislav
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2013, 141 (5-6) : 402 - 408
  • [3] Predictive values of BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
    Badan, Gustavo Machado
    Piato, Sebastiao
    Roveda Junior, Decio
    Castro Fleury, Eduardo de Faria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (10) : 1701 - 1707
  • [4] The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting the Extent of Disease and Predicting the Prognosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Chung, Yoo Seung
    Lee, Youn Soo
    Jeh, Su-Kyung
    Song, Byung-Joo
    Kim, Jeong Soo
    Jeon, Hae Myung
    Jeong, Sang-Seol
    Park, Woo-Chan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2009, 12 (02) : 106 - 112
  • [5] Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Menell, JH
    Morris, EA
    Dershaw, DD
    Abramson, AF
    Brogi, E
    Liberman, L
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (06) : 382 - 390
  • [6] Accuracy of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Mammography in the Preoperative Detection and Measurement of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Analysis
    Preibsch, Heike
    Beckmann, Johannes
    Pawlowski, Johannes
    Kloth, Christopher
    Hahn, Markus
    Staebler, Annette
    Wietek, Beate M.
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Wiesinger, Benjamin
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 760 - 765
  • [7] Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC)
    Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
    Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
    Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
    Rigau, David
    Graewingholt, Axel
    Lebeau, Annette
    Perez Gomez, Elsa
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Langedam, Miranda
    Posso, Margarita
    Parmelli, Elena
    Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (08) : 5880 - 5893
  • [8] Comparison of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography in the measurement of ductal carcinoma in situ: A comparison with histopathology
    Pickles, Martin D.
    Gibbs, Peter
    Hubbard, Anne
    Rahman, Ayesha
    Wieczorek, Joanna
    Turnbull, Lindsay W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 603 - 610
  • [9] Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
    Benveniste, A. P.
    Ortiz-Perez, T.
    Ebuoma, L. O.
    Sepulveda, K. A.
    Severs, F. J.
    Roark, A.
    Wang, T.
    Sedgwick, E. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 96 : 74 - 79
  • [10] Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ
    Wang, Shi-Yi
    Long, Jessica B.
    Killelea, Brigid K.
    Evans, Suzanne B.
    Roberts, Kenneth B.
    Silber, Andrea
    Gross, Cary P.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (01) : 139 - 148