Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction - implications for clinical trials

被引:67
|
作者
Kanagala, Prathap [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Adrian S. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Singh, Anvesha [1 ,2 ]
McAdam, John [1 ,2 ]
Marsh, Anna-Marie [1 ,2 ]
Arnold, Jayanth R. [1 ,2 ]
Squire, Iain B. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Ng, Leong L. [1 ]
McCann, Gerry P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Glenfield Hosp, Leicester Cardiovasc Biomed Res Unit, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Groby Rd, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Glenfield Hosp, Leicester Cardiovasc Biomed Res Unit, NIHR, Groby Rd, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
[3] Kettering & Dist Gen Hosp, Kettering, England
[4] Glenfield Hosp, Leicester Cardiovasc Biomed Res Unit, NIHR, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Leicester, Leicester Cardiovasc Biomed Res Unit, Glenfield Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Sci,Cardiovasc Med, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] Univ Leicester, Leicester Cardiovasc Biomed Res Unit, Glenfield Hosp, NIHR,Cardiovasc Med, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; Heart failure; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Diagnostic; Prognostic; Transthoracic echocardiography; HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; AMERICAN SOCIETY; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12968-017-0424-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a poorly characterized condition. We aimed to phenotype patients with HFpEF using multiparametric stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and to assess the relationship to clinica ! outcomes. Methods: One hundred and fifty four patients (51% male, mean age 72 +/- 10 years) with a diagnosis of HFpEF underwent transthoracic echocardiography and CMR during a single study visit. The CMR protocol comprised cine, stress/rest perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging on a 3T scanner. Follow-up outcome data (death and heart failure hospitalization) were captured after a minimum of 6 months. Results: CMR detected previously undiagnosed pathology in 42 patients (27%), who had. similar baseline characteristics to those without a new diagnosis. These diagnoses consisted of: coronary artery disease (n = 20, including 14 with 'silent' infarction), microvascular dysfunction (n = 11), probable or definite hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 10) and constrictive pericarditis (n = 5). Four patients had dual pathology. During follow-up (median 623 days), patients with a new CMR diagnosis were at higher risk of adverse outcome for the composite endpoint (log rank test: p = 0.047). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, a new CMR diagnosis was the strongest independent predictor of adverse outcome (hazard ratio: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.45; p = 0.03). Conclusions: CMR diagnosed new significant pathology in 27% of patients with HFpEF. These patients were at increased risk of death and heart failure hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Functional and Metabolic Imaging in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Promises, Challenges, and Clinical Utility
    Burrage, Matthew K.
    Lewis, Andrew J.
    Miller, Jack J. J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2023, 37 (02) : 379 - 399
  • [42] Functional and Metabolic Imaging in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Promises, Challenges, and Clinical Utility
    Matthew K Burrage
    Andrew J Lewis
    Jack J J. Miller
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2023, 37 : 379 - 399
  • [43] Patient Selection in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinical Trials
    Kelly, Jacob P.
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Mebazaa, Alexandre
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    Butler, Javed
    Roessig, Lothar
    Fiuzat, Mona
    Zannad, Faiez
    Pitt, Bertram
    O'Connor, Christopher M.
    Lam, Carolyn S. P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (16) : 1668 - 1682
  • [44] Matchmaking for the Optimization of Clinical Trials of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (15) : 1339 - 1342
  • [45] Falling Cardiovascular Mortality in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Implications for Clinical Trials
    Rush, Christopher J.
    Campbell, Ross T.
    Jhund, Pardeep S.
    Connolly, Eugene C.
    Preiss, David
    Gardner, Roy S.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    McMurray, John J. V.
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2015, 3 (08) : 603 - 614
  • [46] Intra-study and inter-technique validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging derived left atrial ejection fraction as a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Prathap Kanagala
    Jayanth R. Arnold
    Anvesha Singh
    Jamal N. Khan
    Gaurav S. Gulsin
    Pankaj Gupta
    Iain B. Squire
    Leong L. Ng
    Gerry P. McCann
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020, 36 : 921 - 928
  • [47] Implications of Coronary Artery Disease in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Hwang, Seok-Jae
    Melenovsky, Vojtech
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (25) : 2817 - 2827
  • [48] Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Will Cardiac Magnetic Imaging Impact on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes?
    Moreyra, Camila
    Moreyra Jr, Eduardo
    Rozich, John D.
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2024, 32 (04) : 371 - 377
  • [49] The utility of cardiovascular imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, biological classification and risk stratification
    Gavin A. Lewis
    Keith Pearce
    Simon G. Williams
    Erik B. Schelbert
    Anita Macnab
    Christopher A. Miller
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2021, 26 : 661 - 678
  • [50] Utility of Echocardiography in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Xu, Bo
    Klein, Allan L.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (06) : 397 - 403