The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): A review of the properties, reliability, and validity of the CTS2 as a measure of partner abuse in community and clinical samples

被引:91
作者
Chapman, Harriet [1 ]
Gillespie, Steven M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Ctr Forens & Criminol Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Psychol Hlth & Soc, Dept Psychol Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
CTS2; Review; Intimate partner violence; Properties; Reliability; Validity; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; INTIMATE-RELATIONSHIPS; BEHAVIOR INVENTORY; FAMILY VIOLENCE; RISK-FACTORS; AGGRESSION; FEMALE; MEN; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.006
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The purpose of this review is to explore the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), focusing on its research uses for assessing Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). An overview of the CTS2 is presented, including the area that it assesses, the purpose of the tool, and its content. The tool's attempts to measure the purported construct are evaluated, drawing upon principles of reliability, validity and appropriate norms. The CTS2 has been found to be a reliable and valid instrument to measure IPV across different populations and across different cultures. However, there are some concerns regarding the internal consistency of the sexual coercion scale among female samples, and explorations of the factor structure of the CTS2 have yielded inconsistent models. While some statistical properties of the scale have been established for different populations, more research is needed to ascertain the validity and reliability of the CTS2 in varied clinical and forensic settings. The strengths and limitations of the CTS2 considered in the review have important implications for interpreting findings of studies investigating IPV using only this tool.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 111 条
  • [1] Adams B.N., 1965, AM J SOCIOL, V71, P714, DOI DOI 10.1086/224227
  • [2] American Psychological Association, 2017, INT PARTN VIOL FACTS
  • [3] Internal Consistency and Factor Structure of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales in a Sample of Deaf Female College Students
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Leigh, Irene W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2010, 25 (05) : 475 - 483
  • [4] [Anonymous], THE GENDER OF CRIME
  • [5] Archer J, 2000, PSYCHOL BULL, V126, P651, DOI [10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651, 10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.651]
  • [6] A preliminary validation of the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER) in Hong Kong
    Au, Alma
    Cheung, George
    Kropp, Randall
    Yuk-chung, Chan
    Lam, Gladys L. T.
    Sung, Pauline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2008, 23 (08) : 727 - 735
  • [7] BECK M, 1998, ABUSIVE BEHAV UNPUB
  • [8] A Further Look at the Intergenerational Transmission of Violence: Witnessing Interparental Violence in Emerging Adulthood
    Black, David S.
    Sussman, Steve
    Unger, Jennifer B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2010, 25 (06) : 1022 - 1042
  • [9] Breiding M., 2015, Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements
  • [10] Cardiac Autonomic Function and Psychological Characteristics of Heterosexual Female Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Physical Aggression
    Brzozowski, Artur
    Gillespie, Steven M.
    Dixon, Louise
    Mitchell, Ian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (7-8) : 3638 - 3661