Early Prediction of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness: A Multicenter External Validation Study

被引:18
|
作者
Witteveen, Esther [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wieske, Luuk [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sommers, Juultje [4 ]
Spijkstra, Jan-Jaap [5 ]
de Waard, Monique C. [5 ]
Endeman, Henrik [6 ]
Rijkenberg, Saskia [6 ]
de Ruijter, Wouter [7 ]
Sleeswijk, Mengalvio [8 ]
Verhamme, Camiel [2 ]
Schultz, Marcus J. [1 ,3 ]
van Schaik, Ivo N. [2 ]
Horn, Janneke [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr AMC, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr AMC, Dept Neurol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr AMC, Lab Expt Intens Care & Anesthesiol LEICA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr AMC, Dept Rehabil, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] VU Med Ctr VUmc, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] OLVG, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgrp, Dept Intens Care Med, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[8] Flevoziekenhuis, Dept Intens Care Med, Almere, Netherlands
关键词
ICU-acquired weakness; prediction; prediction model; predictors; model validation; external validation; CRITICAL ILLNESS; INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT; INDIVIDUAL PROGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS TRIPOD; MODEL; STRENGTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0885066618771001
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: An early diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is often not possible due to impaired consciousness. To avoid a diagnostic delay, we previously developed a prediction model, based on single-center data from 212 patients (development cohort), to predict ICU-AW at 2 days after ICU admission. The objective of this study was to investigate the external validity of the original prediction model in a new, multicenter cohort and, if necessary, to update the model. Methods: Newly admitted ICU patients who were mechanically ventilated at 48 hours after ICU admission were included. Predictors were prospectively recorded, and the outcome ICU-AW was defined by an average Medical Research Council score <4. In the validation cohort, consisting of 349 patients, we analyzed performance of the original prediction model by assessment of calibration and discrimination. Additionally, we updated the model in this validation cohort. Finally, we evaluated a new prediction model based on all patients of the development and validation cohort. Results: Of 349 analyzed patients in the validation cohort, 190 (54%) developed ICU-AW. Both model calibration and discrimination of the original model were poor in the validation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.66). Model updating methods improved calibration but not discrimination. The new prediction model, based on all patients of the development and validation cohort (total of 536 patients) had a fair discrimination, AUC-ROC: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75). Conclusions: The previously developed prediction model for ICU-AW showed poor performance in a new independent multicenter validation cohort. Model updating methods improved calibration but not discrimination. The newly derived prediction model showed fair discrimination. This indicates that early prediction of ICU-AW is still challenging and needs further attention.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 605
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intensive care unit-acquired weakness
    Taylor, Christopher
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [2] Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness
    Kramer, Christopher L.
    NEUROLOGIC CLINICS, 2017, 35 (04) : 723 - +
  • [3] Intensive care unit-acquired weakness
    Dingezweni, S.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 27 (06) : S141 - S144
  • [4] Clinical Application of Ultrasound in Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness
    Patel, Sunil
    Bear, Danielle
    Patel, Brijesh
    Puthucheary, Zudin
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2020, 41 (03): : 244 - 261
  • [5] Early Prediction of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness Using Easily Available Parameters: A Prospective Observational Study
    Wieske, Luuk
    Witteveen, Esther
    Verhamme, Camiel
    Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Daniela S.
    van der Schaaf, Marike
    Schultz, Marcus J.
    van Schaik, Ivo N.
    Horn, Janneke
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [6] Molecular mechanisms of intensive care unit-acquired weakness
    Bloch, S.
    Polkey, M. I.
    Griffiths, M.
    Kemp, P.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 39 (04) : 1000 - 1011
  • [7] Development and validation of an intensive care unit acquired weakness prediction model: A cohort study
    Yang, Zi
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Chang, Guangming
    Cao, Qiuli
    Wang, Faying
    Peng, Zeyu
    Fan, Yuying
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [8] Risk prediction models for intensive care unit-acquired weakness in intensive care unit patients: A systematic review
    Zhang, Wei
    Tang, Yun
    Liu, Huan
    Yuan, Li ping
    Wang, Chu chu
    Chen, Shu fan
    Huang, Jin
    Xiao, Xin yuan
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [9] Early detection and assessment of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a comprehensive review
    Elkalawy, Hanan
    Sekhar, Pavan
    Abosena, Wael
    ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 38 (04) : 409 - 424
  • [10] Prediction and Outcome of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Paresis
    Penuelas, Oscar
    Muriel, Alfonso
    Frutos-Vivar, Fernando
    Fan, Eddy
    Raymondos, Konstantinos
    Rios, Fernando
    Nin, Nicolas
    Thille, Arnaud W.
    Gonzalez, Marco
    Villagomez, Asisclo J.
    Davies, Andrew R.
    Du, Bin
    Maggiore, Salvatore M.
    Matamis, Dimitrios
    Abroug, Fekri
    Moreno, Rui P.
    Kuiper, Michael A.
    Anzueto, Antonio
    Ferguson, Niall D.
    Esteban, Andres
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (01) : 16 - 28