A method for human health impact assessment in social LCA: lessons from three case studies

被引:35
作者
Arvidsson, Rickard [1 ]
Hildenbrand, Jutta [1 ]
Baumann, Henrikke [1 ]
Islam, K. M. Nazmul [2 ]
Parsmo, Rasmus [3 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Environm Syst Anal, Rannvagen 6, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Chittagong, Inst Forestry & Environm Sci, Hathazari 4331, Bangladesh
[3] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Aschebergsgatan 44, S-40014 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Airbag; Catalytic converter; Gold; Human health; Jewellery; Social life cycle assessment (SLCA); LIFE; FOOTPRINT; INJURY; SAFETY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1116-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Improving human health is a long-lasting endeavour of mankind. In the field of social life cycle assessment (SLCA), the importance of human health is often highlighted, and further development of impact assessment methods has been recommended. The purpose of this article is to present a method for assessing human health impacts within SLCA. By using a systematic combining approach, knowledge and experience about assessing human health impacts were obtained from three previously conducted case studies. The first case study was about an airbag system, the second about a catalytic converter and the third about gold jewellery. The disability-adjusted life years (DALY) indicator was used for impact assessment in all three case studies. Both positive and negative human health impacts associated with the products were identified and assessed in the three case studies. For the airbag system, avoided health impacts in the use phase outweighed health impacts during production. For the catalytic converter, whether health impacts avoided exceeded health impacts caused or not depended on which time perspective regarding impacts was employed. Gold jewellery does not help avoiding any health impacts but caused considerable health impacts when produced at a certain location. Based on experience from these case studies, a generic human health impact assessment method was developed, and a life cycle human health typology for products was developed based on the method. The method provides a basis for analysis and interpretation of health impacts along product life cycles, and it is therefore important to report both positive and negative health impacts separately for different actors. The developed human health impact assessment method involves the assessment and comparison of both positive and negative human health impacts along product life cycles. In addition to the products assessed in the three case studies, we suggest additional products that could be particularly interesting to assess with the developed method, including medicines, seat belts, other conflict minerals, alcoholic beverages and products with a high chemical impact.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 699
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Amatayakul W., 2001, J CLEAN PROD, V9, P395, DOI [10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00082-2, DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00082-2]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, WORLD HLTH REP 2013
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, PROF LOSS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, World health statistics 2011
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, MANAGEMENT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework
  • [7] Arvidsson Rickard, 2014, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, P1, DOI [10.1007/S11367--014-0821-3, DOI 10.1007/S11367--014-0821-3]
  • [8] Baumann H., 2004, HITCHHIKERS GUIDE LC, V1st
  • [9] Does the Production of an Airbag Injure more People than the Airbag Saves in Traffic?: Opting for an Empirically Based Approach to Social Life Cycle Assessment
    Baumann, Henrikke
    Arvidsson, Rickard
    Tong, Hui
    Wang, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (04) : 517 - 527
  • [10] Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles
    Bocoum, Ibrahima
    Macombe, Catherine
    Reveret, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (03) : 405 - 417