Evaluation of MLC leaf transmission on IMRT treatment plan quality of patients with advanced lung cancer

被引:7
作者
Chen, Jiayun
Fu, Guishan
Li, Minghui
Song, Yixin
Dai, Jianrong [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Junjie
Liu, Zhiqiang
Li, Yexiong
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Natl Canc Ctr, Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
MLC transmission; IMRT; plan quality; lung sparing; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT-RELATED PNEUMONITIS; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR; RADIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the impact of leaf treatment of multileaf collimator (MLC) in plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of patients with advanced lung cancer. Five MLCs with different leaf transmissions (0.01%, 0.5%, 1.2%, 1.8%, and 3%) were configured for an accelerator in a treatment planning system. Correspondingly, 5 treatment plans with the same optimization setting were created and evaluated quantitatively for each patient (11 patients total) who was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. All of the 5 plans for each patient met the dose requirement for the planning treatment volumes (PTVs) and had similar target dose homogeneity and conformity. On average, the doses to selected organs were as follows: (1) V-5, V-20, and the mean dose of total lung; (2) the maximum and mean dose to spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV); and (3) V-30 and V-40 of heart, decreased slightly when MLC transmission was decreased, but with no statistical differences. There is a clear grouping of plans having total quality score (S-D) value, which is used to evaluate plan quality: (1) more than 1 (patient nos. 1 to 3, 5, and 8), and more than 2.5 (patient no. 6); (2) less than 1 (patient nos. 7 and 10); (3) around 1 (patient nos. 4, 9, and 11). As MLC transmission increased, overall S-D values increased as well and plan dose requirement was harder to meet. The clinical requirements were violated increasingly as MLC transmission became large. Total S-D with and without normal tissue (NT) showed similar results, with no statistically significant differences. Therefore, decrease of MLC transmission did have minimum impact on plan, and it improved target coverage and reduced normal tissue radiation slightly, with no statistical significance. Plan quality could not be significantly improved by MLC transmission reduction. However, lower MLC transmission may have advantages on lung sparing to low- and intermediate-dose exposure. Besides conventional fraction, hyperfraction, or sfeivotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the reduction on lung sparing is still essential because it is highly relevant to radiation pneumonitis (RP). It has potential to diminish incidence of RP and improve patient's quality of life after irradiation with lowered MLC transmission. (C) 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Beam modeling and VMAT performance with the Agility 160-leaf multileaf collimator
    Bedford, James L.
    Thomas, Michael D. R.
    Smyth, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (02): : 172 - 185
  • [2] Monte Carlo modeling of HD120 multileaf collimator on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator for verification of 6X and 6X FFF VMAT SABR treatment plans
    Bergman, Alanah M.
    Gete, Ermias
    Duzenli, Cheryl
    Teke, Tony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (03): : 148 - 163
  • [3] IMRT treatment planning -: A comparative inter-system and intor-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group
    Bohsung, J
    Gillis, S
    Arrans, R
    Bakai, A
    De Wagter, C
    Knöös, T
    Mijnheer, BJ
    Paiusco, M
    Perrin, BA
    Welleweerd, H
    Williams, P
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) : 354 - 361
  • [4] Toxicity and outcome results of RTOG 9311: A phase I-II dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma
    Bradley, J
    Graham, MV
    Winter, K
    Purdy, JA
    Komaki, R
    Roa, WH
    Ryu, JK
    Bosch, W
    Emami, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (02): : 318 - 328
  • [5] Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system
    Cadman, P
    Bassalow, R
    Sidhu, NPS
    Ibbott, G
    Nelson, A
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (16) : 3001 - 3010
  • [6] Validation of physics improvements for IMRT with a commercial treatment-planning system
    Cadman, Patrick
    McNutt, Todd
    Bzdusek, Karl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 6 (02): : 74 - 86
  • [7] A fixed-jaw method to protect critical organs during intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Chen, Jiayun
    Chen, Xinyuan
    Huang, Manni
    Dai, Jianrong
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 325 - 329
  • [8] THE ACCEPTABILITY OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR AS A REPLACEMENT FOR CONVENTIONAL BLOCKS
    FERNANDEZ, EM
    SHENTALL, GS
    MAYLES, WPM
    DEARNALEY, DP
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 36 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [9] Galvin J. M, 1993, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V40, P721
  • [10] Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Graham, MV
    Purdy, JA
    Emami, B
    Harms, W
    Bosch, W
    Lockett, MA
    Perez, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (02): : 323 - 329