Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Elderly Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Starting Pazopanib or Sunitinib Treatment: A Retrospective Medicare Claims Analysis

被引:16
作者
Vogelzang, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Pal, Sumanta K. [2 ]
Ghate, Sameer R. [3 ]
Swallow, Elyse [4 ]
Li, Nanxin [4 ]
Peeples, Miranda [4 ]
Zichlin, Miriam L. [4 ]
Meiselbach, Mark K. [4 ]
Perez, Jose Ricardo [3 ]
Agarwal, Neeraj [5 ]
机构
[1] Comprehens Canc Ctr Nevada, US Oncol Res, Las Vegas, NV USA
[2] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[4] Anal Grp Inc, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Advanced renal cell carcinoma; Claims analysis; Elderly; Healthcare costs; Healthcare resource utilization; Medicare; Overall survival; Pazopanib; Sunitinib; PHASE-III TRIAL; 1ST-LINE SUNITINIB; UNITED-STATES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RISING INCIDENCE; CANCER; SURVIVAL; EXPERIENCE; SORAFENIB; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-017-0628-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Studies indicate similar survival and toxicity between pazopanib and sunitinib, but few have examined real-world outcomes among elderly patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The purpose of this retrospective claims analysis was to assess real-world overall survival (OS), healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs (both all-cause and associated with RCC diagnosis) among elderly advanced RCC patients starting pazopanib or sunitinib treatment. Advanced RCC patients aged 65 years or older who started first-line treatment with pazopanib or sunitinib (index drug; the initiation date was the index date) were identified from the 100% Medicare database plus Part D linkage (January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014). Patients were stratified by index drug and matched 1:1 with use of propensity scores based on baseline characteristics. OS was assessed from the index date to death and compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses and univariable Cox models; patients were censored at the end of eligibility/data. Monthly HRU and costs from an intent-to-treat perspective were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Baseline characteristics were balanced after matching (both N = 522). Treatment with pazopanib was associated with significantly longer median OS compared with treatment with sunitinib (18.2 months vs 14.6 months, respectively; log-rank p = 0.015). Pazopanib was associated with significantly lower monthly all-cause costs compared with sunitinib ($8845 vs $10,416, respectively), as well as lower inpatient costs associated with RCC diagnosis ($1542 vs $2522), fewer monthly inpatient admissions (0.179 vs 0.262), and shorter length of inpatient stay (1.375 days vs 1.883 days; all p ae<currency> 0.004). Among elderly Medicare patients with advanced RCC, first-line pazopanib tretament was associated with significantly longer OS, as well as lower healthcare costs and HRU, compared with first-line sunitinib treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2452 / 2465
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2017, KEY STAT KIDN CANC
[2]  
American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, KIDN CANC RISK FACT
[3]   Treating renal cell cancer in the elderly [J].
Berdjis, N ;
Hakenberg, OW ;
Novotny, V ;
Froehner, M ;
Wirth, MP .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (04) :703-705
[4]   Safety and activity of sunitinib in elderly patients (≥70 years) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter study [J].
Brunello, A. ;
Basso, U. ;
Sacco, C. ;
Sava, T. ;
De Vivo, R. ;
Camerini, A. ;
Barile, C. ;
Roma, A. ;
Maruzzo, M. ;
Falci, C. ;
Zagonel, V. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) :336-342
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from an Italian National Health Service Perspective [J].
Capri, Stefano ;
Porta, Camillo ;
Delea, Thomas E. .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (03) :567-+
[6]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[7]  
Chittoria N., 2013, Renal cell carcinoma. Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education Web site
[8]   Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States [J].
Chow, WH ;
Devesa, SS ;
Warren, JL ;
Fraumeni, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (17) :1628-1631
[9]   Cost-Effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib for Renal Cancer in the United States [J].
Delea, Thomas E. ;
Amdahl, Jordan ;
Diaz, Jose ;
Nakhaipour, Hamid Reza ;
Hackshaw, Michelle D. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (01) :46-U135
[10]   Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial Assessing Treatment Preference for Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: PISCES Study [J].
Escudier, Bernard ;
Porta, Camillo ;
Bono, Petri ;
Powles, Thomas ;
Eisen, Tim ;
Sternberg, Cora N. ;
Gschwend, Juergen E. ;
De Giorgi, Ugo ;
Parikh, Omi ;
Hawkins, Robert ;
Sevin, Emmanuel ;
Negrier, Sylvie ;
Khan, Sadya ;
Diaz, Jose ;
Redhu, Suman ;
Mehmud, Faisal ;
Cella, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (14) :1412-+