Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Elderly Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Starting Pazopanib or Sunitinib Treatment: A Retrospective Medicare Claims Analysis

被引:14
作者
Vogelzang, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Pal, Sumanta K. [2 ]
Ghate, Sameer R. [3 ]
Swallow, Elyse [4 ]
Li, Nanxin [4 ]
Peeples, Miranda [4 ]
Zichlin, Miriam L. [4 ]
Meiselbach, Mark K. [4 ]
Perez, Jose Ricardo [3 ]
Agarwal, Neeraj [5 ]
机构
[1] Comprehens Canc Ctr Nevada, US Oncol Res, Las Vegas, NV USA
[2] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[4] Anal Grp Inc, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Advanced renal cell carcinoma; Claims analysis; Elderly; Healthcare costs; Healthcare resource utilization; Medicare; Overall survival; Pazopanib; Sunitinib; PHASE-III TRIAL; 1ST-LINE SUNITINIB; UNITED-STATES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RISING INCIDENCE; CANCER; SURVIVAL; EXPERIENCE; SORAFENIB; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-017-0628-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Studies indicate similar survival and toxicity between pazopanib and sunitinib, but few have examined real-world outcomes among elderly patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The purpose of this retrospective claims analysis was to assess real-world overall survival (OS), healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs (both all-cause and associated with RCC diagnosis) among elderly advanced RCC patients starting pazopanib or sunitinib treatment. Advanced RCC patients aged 65 years or older who started first-line treatment with pazopanib or sunitinib (index drug; the initiation date was the index date) were identified from the 100% Medicare database plus Part D linkage (January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014). Patients were stratified by index drug and matched 1:1 with use of propensity scores based on baseline characteristics. OS was assessed from the index date to death and compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses and univariable Cox models; patients were censored at the end of eligibility/data. Monthly HRU and costs from an intent-to-treat perspective were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Baseline characteristics were balanced after matching (both N = 522). Treatment with pazopanib was associated with significantly longer median OS compared with treatment with sunitinib (18.2 months vs 14.6 months, respectively; log-rank p = 0.015). Pazopanib was associated with significantly lower monthly all-cause costs compared with sunitinib ($8845 vs $10,416, respectively), as well as lower inpatient costs associated with RCC diagnosis ($1542 vs $2522), fewer monthly inpatient admissions (0.179 vs 0.262), and shorter length of inpatient stay (1.375 days vs 1.883 days; all p ae<currency> 0.004). Among elderly Medicare patients with advanced RCC, first-line pazopanib tretament was associated with significantly longer OS, as well as lower healthcare costs and HRU, compared with first-line sunitinib treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2452 / 2465
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, 2017, KEY STAT KIDN CANC
  • [2] American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, KIDN CANC RISK FACT
  • [3] Treating renal cell cancer in the elderly
    Berdjis, N
    Hakenberg, OW
    Novotny, V
    Froehner, M
    Wirth, MP
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (04) : 703 - 705
  • [4] Safety and activity of sunitinib in elderly patients (≥70 years) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter study
    Brunello, A.
    Basso, U.
    Sacco, C.
    Sava, T.
    De Vivo, R.
    Camerini, A.
    Barile, C.
    Roma, A.
    Maruzzo, M.
    Falci, C.
    Zagonel, V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 336 - 342
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from an Italian National Health Service Perspective
    Capri, Stefano
    Porta, Camillo
    Delea, Thomas E.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (03) : 567 - +
  • [6] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [7] Chittoria N., 2013, Renal cell carcinoma. Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education Web site
  • [8] Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States
    Chow, WH
    Devesa, SS
    Warren, JL
    Fraumeni, JF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (17): : 1628 - 1631
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib for Renal Cancer in the United States
    Delea, Thomas E.
    Amdahl, Jordan
    Diaz, Jose
    Nakhaipour, Hamid Reza
    Hackshaw, Michelle D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (01) : 46 - U135
  • [10] Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial Assessing Treatment Preference for Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: PISCES Study
    Escudier, Bernard
    Porta, Camillo
    Bono, Petri
    Powles, Thomas
    Eisen, Tim
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    De Giorgi, Ugo
    Parikh, Omi
    Hawkins, Robert
    Sevin, Emmanuel
    Negrier, Sylvie
    Khan, Sadya
    Diaz, Jose
    Redhu, Suman
    Mehmud, Faisal
    Cella, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (14) : 1412 - +