Tire traction models - Comparative analysis and validation

被引:0
|
作者
Radu, Rosca [1 ]
Ioan, Tenu [1 ]
Petru, Carlescu [1 ]
Edward, Rakosi [2 ]
Gheorghe, Manolache [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Sci, Iasi, Romania
[2] Tech Univ Gh Asachi, Iasi, Romania
来源
ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING | 2008年 / 36卷
关键词
tire traction; wheel slip; traction models; PREDICTION; SOIL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The paper presents a comparative analysis of different tire traction models. The model developed by the authors, starting from a Bekker type pressure-sinkage relationship, was compared with the Wismer&Luth, the MacLaurin and the Gee-Clough models, in terms of specific net traction coefficient. Traction force and traction efficiency were also calculated. In order to validate the theoretical results, field tests were developed, using the U-650 tractor, equipped with the P2V plow. Variation of plow width and depth allowed different traction forces and drive wheel slips to be obtained. During the experiments, drive wheel slip and net traction force were measured directly, for wheel slip up to 30%. The results predicted by the proposed model fit well the experimental results; the average differences between calculated and measured data did not exceed 0.25...0.4 kN for the traction force and 4...5% for the traction efficiency. Applying the original Gee-Clough and Wismer&Luth equations leads to significant differences compared to experimental data over the entire range of wheel slip values (0 to 100%). When the MacLaurin wheel numeric is used in the Gee-Clough and Wismer&Luth equations, the specific net traction coefficient given by the Wismer&Luth model matches the experimental data and the values given by the proposed model when drive wheel slip does not exceed 28...29%.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Loess Collapse Potential
    Sahand Motameni
    Fateme Rostami
    Sara Farzai
    Abbas Soroush
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2024, 42 : 881 - 894
  • [32] Validation of chemometric models - A tutorial
    Westad, Frank
    Marini, Federico
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 893 : 14 - 24
  • [33] A framework for validation of computer models
    Bayarri, Maria J.
    Berger, James O.
    Paulo, Rui
    Sacks, Jerry
    Cafeo, John A.
    Cavendish, James
    Lin, Chin-Hsu
    Tu, Jian
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2007, 49 (02) : 138 - 154
  • [34] Analysis of suitable of traction model for sandy clay loam soils on farm use of tractor
    Kumar, A. Ashok
    Tewari, V. K.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2021, 5
  • [35] Validation of Decision-Making Models and Analysis of Decision Variables in the Rat Basal Ganglia
    Ito, Makoto
    Doya, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (31): : 9861 - 9874
  • [36] Soil/Tire Interaction Analysis Using FEM and FVM
    Oida, S.
    Seta, E.
    Heguri, H.
    Kato, K.
    TIRE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 33 (01) : 38 - 62
  • [37] Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models for Accurate Estimation of Groundwater Nitrate Concentration
    Band, Shahab S.
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    Chowdhuri, Indrajit
    Siabi, Zhaleh
    Norouzi, Akbar
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    Shokri, Manouchehr
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (20) : 1 - 23
  • [38] A comparative analysis of Turkish bank failures using logit, probit and discriminant models
    Unvan, Yuksel Akay
    Tatlidil, Huseyin
    ASIA LIFE SCIENCES, 2013, 22 (01): : 281 - 302
  • [39] Comparative Assessment of Modified γ-Reθt Models for Scramjet Intake Flow Analysis
    Kang, Sunoh
    Shin, Ho Cheol
    Park, Soo Hyung
    Park, Jaeyoung
    Park, Donghun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [40] Models of Hysteresis Water Retention Capacity and Their Comparative Analysis on the Example of Sandy Soil
    Terleev, Vitaly
    Mirschel, Wilfried
    Nikonorov, Aleksandr
    Lazarev, Viktor
    Ginevsky, Roman
    Topaj, Alex
    Moiseev, Kirill
    Pashtetsky, Vladimir
    Dunaieva, Ielizaveta
    Popovych, Valentina
    Melnichuk, Aleksandr
    Arkhipov, Mikhail
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENERGY MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES EMMFT 2018, VOL 2, 2019, 983 : 462 - 471