Expectation-based syntactic comprehension

被引:1105
作者
Levy, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Linguist, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
parsing; frequency; sentence processing; information theory; prediction; syntax; word order; syntactic complexity;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the role of resource allocation as a source of processing difficulty in human sentence comprehension. The paper proposes a simple information-theoretic characterization of processing difficulty as the work incurred by resource reallocation during parallel, incremental, probabilistic disambiguation in sentence comprehension, and demonstrates its equivalence to the theory of Hale [Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of NAACL (Vol. 2, pp. 159-166)], in which the difficulty of a word is proportional to its stirprisal (its negative log-probability) in the context within which it appears. This proposal subsumes and clarifies findings that high-constraint contexts can facilitate lexical processing, and connects these findings to well-known models of parallel constraint-based comprehension. In addition, the theory leads to a number of specific predictions about the role of expectation in syntactic comprehension, including the reversal of locality-based difficulty patterns in syntactically constrained contexts, and conditions under which increased ambiguity facilitates processing. The paper examines a range of established results bearing on these predictions, and shows that they are largely consistent with the surprisal theory. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / 1177
页数:52
相关论文
共 105 条
[61]  
Klein Dan, 2003, P ACL
[62]   Locality and parsing complexity [J].
Konieczny, L .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2000, 29 (06) :627-645
[63]  
KONIECZNY L, 2005, P 27 ANN C COGN SCI
[64]  
Konieczny L, 1996, THESIS U FREIBURG
[65]   READING SENSELESS SENTENCES - BRAIN POTENTIALS REFLECT SEMANTIC INCONGRUITY [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4427) :203-205
[66]   BRAIN POTENTIALS DURING READING REFLECT WORD EXPECTANCY AND SEMANTIC ASSOCIATION [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
NATURE, 1984, 307 (5947) :161-163
[67]   LEXICAL NATURE OF SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION [J].
MACDONALD, MC ;
PEARLMUTTER, NJ ;
SEIDENBERG, MS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1994, 101 (04) :676-703
[68]   THE INTERACTION OF LEXICAL AND SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY [J].
MACDONALD, MC .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1993, 32 (05) :692-715
[69]  
Marcus Mitchell P., 1993, Computational Linguistics, V19, P313, DOI 10.21236/ADA273556
[70]   SENTENCE PERCEPTION AS AN INTERACTIVE PARALLEL PROCESS [J].
MARSLENWILSON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1975, 189 (4198) :226-228