Accounting for Representativeness in the Verification of Ensemble Precipitation Forecasts

被引:27
作者
Ben Bouallegue, Zied [1 ]
Haiden, Thomas [1 ]
Weber, Nicholas J. [2 ]
Hamill, Thomas M. [3 ]
Richardson, David S. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] NOAA, Div Phys Sci, Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
关键词
Statistical techniques; Ensembles; Forecast verification; skill; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; OBSERVATION ERRORS; MODEL; PROBABILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-19-0323.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Spatial variability of precipitation is analyzed to characterize to what extent precipitation observed at a single location is representative of precipitation over a larger area. Characterization of precipitation representativeness is made in probabilistic terms using a parametric approach, namely, by fitting a censored shifted gamma distribution to observation measurements. Parameters are estimated and analyzed for independent precipitation datasets, among which one is based on high-density gauge measurements. The results of this analysis serve as a basis for accounting for representativeness error in an ensemble verification process. Uncertainty associated with the scale mismatch between forecast and observation is accounted for by applying a perturbed-ensemble approach before the computation of scores. Verification results reveal a large impact of representativeness error on precipitation forecast reliability and skill estimates. The parametric model and estimated coefficients presented in this study could be used directly for forecast postprocessing to partly compensate for the limitation of any modeling system in terms of precipitation subgrid-scale variability.
引用
收藏
页码:2049 / 2062
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   Could a perfect model ever satisfy a naive forecaster?: On grid box mean versus point verification [J].
Goeber, Martin ;
Zsoter, Ervin ;
Richardson, David S. .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 15 (03) :359-365
[22]  
Haiden T., 2018, ECMWF Tech. Memo. 834
[23]   Probabilistic forecast calibration using ECMWF and GFS ensemble reforecasts. Part II: Precipitation [J].
Hamill, Thomas M. ;
Hagedorn, Renate ;
Whitaker, Jeffrey S. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2008, 136 (07) :2620-2632
[24]   Probabilistic Precipitation Forecast Postprocessing Using Quantile Mapping and Rank-Weighted Best-Member Dressing [J].
Hamill, Thomas M. ;
Scheuerer, Michael .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2018, 146 (12) :4079-4098
[25]   The US National Blend of Models for Statistical Postprocessing of Probability of Precipitation and Deterministic Precipitation Amount [J].
Hamill, Thomas M. ;
Engle, Eric ;
Myrick, David ;
Peroutka, Matthew ;
Finan, Christina ;
Scheuerer, Michael .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2017, 145 (09) :3441-3463
[26]  
Hamill TM, 1997, MON WEATHER REV, V125, P1312, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1312:VOERSR>2.0.CO
[27]  
2
[28]   On the representation error in data assimilation [J].
Janjic, T. ;
Bormann, N. ;
Bocquet, M. ;
Carton, J. A. ;
Cohn, S. E. ;
Dance, S. L. ;
Losa, S. N. ;
Nichols, N. K. ;
Potthast, R. ;
Waller, J. A. ;
Weston, P. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 144 (713) :1257-1278
[29]   Probability forecasts with observation error: what should be forecast? [J].
Jolliffe, I. T. .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 24 (02) :276-278
[30]   Ensemble forecasting [J].
Leutbecher, M. ;
Palmer, T. N. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2008, 227 (07) :3515-3539