A call to bridge the divide in breast reconstruction research: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan, Po Hsiang [1 ]
Xu, Rebecca [1 ]
Maclean, Luke [1 ]
Al Muqaimi, Nawaf [2 ]
Elmi, Maryam [3 ]
Isaac, Kathryn, V [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] UT Texas Hlth San Antonio MD Anderson Canc Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Multidisciplinary; Systematic review; Breast cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2021.06.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breast reconstruction is an important component of comprehensive breast cancer care. Although reconstructive plans require multidisciplinary clinical-decision making, research in cross-discipline collaborations is often limited. This study aims to evaluate multidisciplinary involvement in breast reconstruction outcomes research. Methods: A systematic review of breast reconstruction literature published from 2000 to 2019 using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and PubMed databases was conducted. English language articles published in North America or Europe with n >= 12 nonpediatric patients were included. Articles concerning procedures not performed in the context of breast cancer care or articles that did not evaluate at least one outcome, diagnostic test, or risk factor were excluded. Authors' affiliations were used to define multidisciplinary involvement. Quality of research was evaluated using the level of evidence, journal impact factor (IF), and altmetrics. Results: Of the 1679 articles screened, 784 met the stated eligibility criteria. Only half (50.6%) of these articles involved an author outside the discipline of plastic surgery. Compared to non-multidisciplinary studies, multidisciplinary studies were more likely to be designated with a higher level of evidence (I or II) (p<0.001), published in journals with higher IF (p<0.05), have higher usage (p = 0.03), and mentions (p = 0.02). There was no difference in citations, captures, and social media posts (p>0.05). Conclusion: Breast reconstruction outcomes research often fails to offer author collaborations from nonplastic surgery disciplines. Multidisciplinary involvement in breast cancer care research is strongly recommended to improve the quality and impact of clinical studies in breast reconstruction. (C) 2021 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 84
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Conserving Surgery: A Review
    Karri Adamson
    David D. Rivedal
    Erin L. Doren
    Current Surgery Reports, 8
  • [42] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Microvascular Stacked and Conjoined-Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Nolan, Ian T.
    Bekisz, Jonathan M.
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Thanik, Vishal D.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2021, 37 (08) : 631 - 642
  • [43] Lipofilling in breast reconstruction: Is there any population with higher risk of local recurrence? Literature systematic review
    Simorre, M.
    Chaput, B.
    Stephanopoli, M. Voglimacci
    Garrido, I.
    Soule-Tholy, M.
    Leguevaque, P.
    Vaysse, C.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2015, 43 (04): : 309 - 318
  • [44] Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to support patient decision making about breast reconstruction: A systematic review
    Paraskeva, Nicole
    Guest, Ella
    Lewis-Smith, Helena
    Harcourt, Diana
    BREAST, 2018, 40 : 97 - 105
  • [45] Low incidence of complications using polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) mesh in breast reconstruction: A systematic review
    Rodriguez-Unda, Nelson
    Leiva, Stephanie
    Cheng, Hsu-Tang
    Seal, Stella M.
    Cooney, Carisa M.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (11) : 1543 - 1549
  • [46] Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bargon, Claudia A.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Ikinci, Mehmet
    Braakenburg, Assa
    Rakhorst, Hinne A.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Doeksen, Annemiek
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (19) : 3449 - 3469
  • [47] Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Zhong, Toni
    Fletcher, Glenn G.
    Brackstone, Muriel
    Frank, Simon G.
    Hanrahan, Renee
    Miragias, Vivian
    Stevens, Christiaan
    Vesprini, Danny
    Vito, Alyssa
    Wright, Frances C.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (04)
  • [48] Advances and applications of artificial intelligence in breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review
    Ospina-Gomez, Juan E.
    Molano-Diaz, Juan M.
    Rojas-Gomez, Maria C.
    Latorre-Arevalo, Maria G.
    Sanchez-Vargas, Marcela
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [49] Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
    E. Donnely
    M. Griffin
    P. E. Butler
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 48 : 9 - 25
  • [50] Breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic A systematic review
    Sun, Pengfei
    Luan, Fang
    Xu, Di
    Cao, Rui
    Cai, Xia
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (33)