Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy

被引:0
作者
Oliveira, Soraya da Silva [1 ]
Mattos de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Sverzut, Cassio Edvard [1 ]
Trivellato, Alexandre Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto FORP USP, Ave Cafe S-N, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG | 2022年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Rigid internal fixation; In vitro technique; Polyurethanes; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; MANDIBULAR RAMUS; ADVANCEMENT; STABILITY; PATTERNS; PLATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This study compared the mechanical behavior of two fixation techniques used in three sections representing the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in polyurethane replicas that were divided into groups, according to type of section, and sub-groups according to type of fixation, simulating 11-mm advancement and 6o clockwise mandibular rotation. Methods Loads were applied in two regions, aiming at progressive application and consequent strength value, measured in kilogram-force in displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm, from the load application tip. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed, followed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-2 way), and Bonferroni's multiple comparison. Results The results showed no statistically significant difference in the type of section and type of fixation used when load was applied to the inter-incisor region. However, when load was applied to the first molar region, statistically significant difference was observed in 1-mm displacement, in which section described by Epker with two modifications showed greater strength, regardless of type of fixation used (p = 0.007). Conclusion In the application of load in the inter-incisor region, there was no statistical difference between the type of osteotomy and the type of fixation used. When applying loads to molars, there was a difference for the type of osteotomy, where the Epker osteotomy with 2 modifications presented greater resistance, regardless of the type of fixation used.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 639
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Assessment of Resorbable and Non-resorbable Fixation Systems in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: An In vitro Study [J].
Davani Latarullo Costa ;
Alexandre Machado Torres ;
Isabela Polesi Bergamaschi ;
Leandro Eduardo Kluppel ;
Rogério Belle de Oliveira ;
João Batista Blessmann Weber .
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2022, 21 :779-784
[42]   Comparison of postoperative condylar changes after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional analysis [J].
Kang, Hyo-Sun ;
Han, Jeong Joon ;
Jung, Seunggon ;
Kook, Min-Suk ;
Park, Hong-Ju ;
Oh, Hee-Kyun .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 130 (05) :505-514
[43]   The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on submental-cervical aesthetics [J].
Soydan, S. S. ;
Uckan, S. ;
Ustdal, A. ;
Bayram, B. ;
Bayrak, B. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 41 (11) :816-821
[44]   Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement [J].
Loureiro Sato, Fabio Ricardo ;
Asprino, Luciana ;
Fernandes Moreira, Roger William ;
de Moraes, Marcio .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (05) :E224-E229
[45]   Hard and Soft Tissue Stability of Orthognathic Surgery Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy [J].
Kitahara, Toru ;
Nakasima, Akihiko ;
Kurahara, Shinichi ;
Shiratsuchi, Yuji .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (01) :158-165
[46]   Comparative analysis of the amount of postoperative drainage after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy [J].
Kim, Hyunyoung ;
Chung, Seung-Won ;
Jung, Hwi-Dong ;
Park, Hyung-Sik ;
Jung, Young-Soo .
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2014, 40 (04) :169-172
[47]   Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement [J].
De Oliveira, Leandro Benetti ;
Nunes Reis, Jose Mauricio ;
Spin-Neto, Rubens ;
Cabrini Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida ;
Oguz, Yener ;
Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 54 (05) :573-578
[48]   The relationship between fixation method and early central condylar sagging after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in orthognathic surgery [J].
Berkoz, Omer ;
Karaali, Soner ;
Kozanoglu, Erol ;
Akalin, Bora Edim ;
Ceri, Atilla ;
Baris, Sahin ;
Marsan, Gulnaz ;
Cura, Nil ;
Emekli, Ufuk .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (10) :928-932
[49]   Investigation of the efficacy of two different laser types in the treatment of lower lip paresthesia after sagittal split ramus osteotomy [J].
Baydan, Ebru ;
Soylu, Emrah .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (01)
[50]   MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation [J].
Takahara, Namiaki ;
Kabasawa, Yuji ;
Sato, Masaru ;
Tetsumura, Akemi ;
Kurabayashi, Tohru ;
Omura, Ken .
CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2017, 35 (01) :38-45