Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy

被引:0
作者
Oliveira, Soraya da Silva [1 ]
Mattos de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Sverzut, Cassio Edvard [1 ]
Trivellato, Alexandre Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto FORP USP, Ave Cafe S-N, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG | 2022年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Rigid internal fixation; In vitro technique; Polyurethanes; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; MANDIBULAR RAMUS; ADVANCEMENT; STABILITY; PATTERNS; PLATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This study compared the mechanical behavior of two fixation techniques used in three sections representing the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in polyurethane replicas that were divided into groups, according to type of section, and sub-groups according to type of fixation, simulating 11-mm advancement and 6o clockwise mandibular rotation. Methods Loads were applied in two regions, aiming at progressive application and consequent strength value, measured in kilogram-force in displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm, from the load application tip. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed, followed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-2 way), and Bonferroni's multiple comparison. Results The results showed no statistically significant difference in the type of section and type of fixation used when load was applied to the inter-incisor region. However, when load was applied to the first molar region, statistically significant difference was observed in 1-mm displacement, in which section described by Epker with two modifications showed greater strength, regardless of type of fixation used (p = 0.007). Conclusion In the application of load in the inter-incisor region, there was no statistical difference between the type of osteotomy and the type of fixation used. When applying loads to molars, there was a difference for the type of osteotomy, where the Epker osteotomy with 2 modifications presented greater resistance, regardless of the type of fixation used.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 639
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis
    Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez, Eder
    Caldas, Ricardo Armini
    Goulart, Douglas Rangel
    de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
    Olate, Sergio
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    de Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (07) : 1015 - 1019
  • [32] Modified Medial Ramus Retractor to Facilitate Horizontal Osteotomy During Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Procedure
    Ganesh, Praveen
    Nagarjuna, Muralidhara
    Boyina, Kiran Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (07) : E625 - E627
  • [33] Skeletal Relapse Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement
    Sahoo N.K.
    Jayan B.
    Thakral A.
    Nagpal V.
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2015, 14 (2) : 357 - 362
  • [34] Anatomic Study for the Horizontal Cut of the Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    de Souza Fernandes, Atson Carlos
    Cardoso, Pauline Magalhaes
    Fernandes, Itana Santos
    de Moraes, Marcio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 71 (07) : 1239 - 1244
  • [35] The Biomechanical Effects of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy on Temporomandibular Joint
    Liu, Zhan
    Shu, Jingheng
    Zhang, Yuanli
    Fan, Yubo
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (11) : 617 - 624
  • [36] Condylar positioning in sagittal split ramus osteotomy by the triangle method
    Baek, RM
    Yoon, IM
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 55 (03) : 335 - 337
  • [38] In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate
    Pereira Filho, V. A.
    Iamashita, H. Y.
    Monnazzi, M. S.
    Gabrielli, M. F. R.
    Vaz, L. G.
    Passeri, L. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (03) : 316 - 320
  • [39] How does bone thickness affect the split pattern of sagittal ramus osteotomy?
    Cunha, G.
    Oliveira, M. R.
    Salmen, F. S.
    Gabrielli, M. F. R.
    Gabrielli, M. A. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [40] Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis
    Altuncu, Fuat
    Kazan, Dilara
    Ozden, Bora
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2023, 28 (06): : E553 - E561