Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy

被引:0
作者
Oliveira, Soraya da Silva [1 ]
Mattos de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Sverzut, Cassio Edvard [1 ]
Trivellato, Alexandre Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto FORP USP, Ave Cafe S-N, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG | 2022年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Rigid internal fixation; In vitro technique; Polyurethanes; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; MANDIBULAR RAMUS; ADVANCEMENT; STABILITY; PATTERNS; PLATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This study compared the mechanical behavior of two fixation techniques used in three sections representing the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in polyurethane replicas that were divided into groups, according to type of section, and sub-groups according to type of fixation, simulating 11-mm advancement and 6o clockwise mandibular rotation. Methods Loads were applied in two regions, aiming at progressive application and consequent strength value, measured in kilogram-force in displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm, from the load application tip. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed, followed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-2 way), and Bonferroni's multiple comparison. Results The results showed no statistically significant difference in the type of section and type of fixation used when load was applied to the inter-incisor region. However, when load was applied to the first molar region, statistically significant difference was observed in 1-mm displacement, in which section described by Epker with two modifications showed greater strength, regardless of type of fixation used (p = 0.007). Conclusion In the application of load in the inter-incisor region, there was no statistical difference between the type of osteotomy and the type of fixation used. When applying loads to molars, there was a difference for the type of osteotomy, where the Epker osteotomy with 2 modifications presented greater resistance, regardless of the type of fixation used.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 639
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A New Condyle Repositionable Plate for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Baek, Rong-Min
    Lee, Sang Woo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 21 (02) : 489 - 490
  • [22] Changes in the computed tomography (pixel) value of mandibular ramus bone and fixation screws after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Ueki, K.
    Moroi, A.
    Iguchi, R.
    Kosaka, A.
    Ikawa, H.
    Yoshizawa, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (11) : 1337 - 1345
  • [23] Morphometric Study of Mandibular Ramus Related to Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy and Osteosynthesis
    de Oliveira, Marcelo Vinicius
    de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
    Olate, Sergio
    Alonso, Maria Beatriz C.
    Aranha Watanabe, Plauto Christopher
    Haiter-Neto, Francisco
    de Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (05) : 1484 - 1487
  • [24] Periosteal Reflection on the Medial Approach to the Mandibular Ramus in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Muto, Toshitaka
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 22 (06) : 2281 - 2283
  • [25] An in vitro comparison between two different designs of sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Andrade, Valdir Cabral
    Luthi, Leonardo Flores
    Sato, Fabio Loureiro
    Pozzer, Leandro
    Olate, Sergio
    Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2015, 41 (03) : 133 - 138
  • [26] Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis
    He, Yu
    Zhang, Henglei
    Qiao, Jia
    Fu, Xi
    Xu, Shixing
    Jin, Qi
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Chen, Ying
    Yu, Bing
    Niu, Feng
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [27] Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates—a numerical study
    Albougha S.
    Albogha M.H.
    Darwich M.A.
    Darwich K.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2015, 19 (3) : 281 - 285
  • [28] Evaluation of different screw fixation techniques and screw diameters in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis method
    Sindel, A.
    Demiralp, S.
    Colok, G.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 41 (09) : 683 - 691
  • [29] Evaluation of overlapped cortical bone area after modified plate fixation with bent plate in sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Ueki, Koichiro
    Marukawa, Kohei
    Moroi, Akinori
    Sotobori, Megumi
    Ishihara, Yuri
    Iguchi, Ran
    Kosaka, Akihiko
    Nakano, Yoshio
    Higuchi, Masatoshi
    Nakazawa, Ryuichi
    Ikawa, Hiroumi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (05) : E210 - E216
  • [30] Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis
    Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez, Eder
    Caldas, Ricardo Armini
    Goulart, Douglas Rangel
    de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson
    Olate, Sergio
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    de Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (07) : 1015 - 1019