Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy

被引:0
作者
Oliveira, Soraya da Silva [1 ]
Mattos de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Sverzut, Cassio Edvard [1 ]
Trivellato, Alexandre Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto FORP USP, Ave Cafe S-N, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG | 2022年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Rigid internal fixation; In vitro technique; Polyurethanes; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; MANDIBULAR RAMUS; ADVANCEMENT; STABILITY; PATTERNS; PLATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This study compared the mechanical behavior of two fixation techniques used in three sections representing the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in polyurethane replicas that were divided into groups, according to type of section, and sub-groups according to type of fixation, simulating 11-mm advancement and 6o clockwise mandibular rotation. Methods Loads were applied in two regions, aiming at progressive application and consequent strength value, measured in kilogram-force in displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm, from the load application tip. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed, followed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-2 way), and Bonferroni's multiple comparison. Results The results showed no statistically significant difference in the type of section and type of fixation used when load was applied to the inter-incisor region. However, when load was applied to the first molar region, statistically significant difference was observed in 1-mm displacement, in which section described by Epker with two modifications showed greater strength, regardless of type of fixation used (p = 0.007). Conclusion In the application of load in the inter-incisor region, there was no statistical difference between the type of osteotomy and the type of fixation used. When applying loads to molars, there was a difference for the type of osteotomy, where the Epker osteotomy with 2 modifications presented greater resistance, regardless of the type of fixation used.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 639
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment of sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques using a finite element method
    Albougha, S.
    Darwich, K.
    Darwich, M. A.
    Albogha, M. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (07) : 823 - 829
  • [12] Evaluation of mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Salgado A, Guillermo
    Inzunza H, Oscar
    Cantin, Mario
    Fuentes, Ramon
    Inostroza, Veronica
    Jesus Errazuriz, Maria
    Pavez, Cindy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2012, 30 (01): : 30 - 39
  • [13] Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis
    Sato, F. R. L.
    Asprino, L.
    Noritomi, P. Y.
    da Silva, J. V. L.
    de Moraes, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (08) : 934 - 941
  • [14] Evaluation of the effect of mandibular length and height on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques: A finite element analysis
    Ozasir, E. Ergezen
    Tosun, E.
    Tuz, H. H.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 121 (06) : 652 - 657
  • [15] Comparative Biomechanical and Photoelastic Evaluation of Different Fixation Techniques of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Advancement
    Loureiro Sato, Fabio Ricardo
    Asprino, Luciana
    Consani, Simonides
    de Moraes, Marcio
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [16] A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis
    Loureiro Sato, Fabio Ricardo
    Asprino, Luciana
    Consani, Simonides
    Noritomi, Pedro Y.
    de Moraes, Marcio
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 114 (05): : S60 - S68
  • [17] Sagittal split ramus osteotomy, intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, and lateral corticectomy for asymmetric mandibular prognathism
    Lee, Joo Young
    Han, Se Jin
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2021, 47 (04) : 249 - 256
  • [18] Dislocation of Temporomandibular Joint: Complication of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki
    Morishita, Tadashi
    Saiga, Atsuomi
    Kubota, Yoshitaka
    Omori, Naoko
    Akita, Shinsuke
    Satoh, Kaneshige
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (05) : 1674 - 1675
  • [19] Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Kuroyanagi, N.
    Miyachi, H.
    Ochiai, S.
    Kamiya, N.
    Kanazawa, T.
    Nagao, T.
    Shimozato, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (07) : 814 - 822
  • [20] Unilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for the treatment of asymmetric mandibles
    Lee, Jee-Ho
    Park, Tae-Jun
    Jeon, Ju-Hong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2015, 41 (02) : 102 - 108