Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy

被引:0
作者
Oliveira, Soraya da Silva [1 ]
Mattos de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Sverzut, Cassio Edvard [1 ]
Trivellato, Alexandre Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto FORP USP, Ave Cafe S-N, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG | 2022年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Rigid internal fixation; In vitro technique; Polyurethanes; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; MANDIBULAR RAMUS; ADVANCEMENT; STABILITY; PATTERNS; PLATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This study compared the mechanical behavior of two fixation techniques used in three sections representing the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in polyurethane replicas that were divided into groups, according to type of section, and sub-groups according to type of fixation, simulating 11-mm advancement and 6o clockwise mandibular rotation. Methods Loads were applied in two regions, aiming at progressive application and consequent strength value, measured in kilogram-force in displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm, from the load application tip. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed, followed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-2 way), and Bonferroni's multiple comparison. Results The results showed no statistically significant difference in the type of section and type of fixation used when load was applied to the inter-incisor region. However, when load was applied to the first molar region, statistically significant difference was observed in 1-mm displacement, in which section described by Epker with two modifications showed greater strength, regardless of type of fixation used (p = 0.007). Conclusion In the application of load in the inter-incisor region, there was no statistical difference between the type of osteotomy and the type of fixation used. When applying loads to molars, there was a difference for the type of osteotomy, where the Epker osteotomy with 2 modifications presented greater resistance, regardless of the type of fixation used.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 639
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Soraya da Silva Oliveira
    Pedro Henrique Mattos de Carvalho
    Cássio Edvard Sverzut
    Alexandre Elias Trivellato
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 26 : 633 - 639
  • [2] Biomechanical Evaluation of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Setback
    Chen, Michael Y. C.
    Wu, Yi-Fan
    Huang, Heng-Li
    Hsu, Jui-Ting
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [3] Influence of the design in sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the mechanical behavior
    Pozzer, Leandro
    Olate, Sergio
    Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas
    de Moraes, Marcio
    Ricardo Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (05): : 1284 - 1288
  • [4] Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement
    Gursoytrak, Burcu
    Unsal, Nurdan
    Demetoglu, Umut
    Simsek, Hasan Onur
    Saglam, Haci
    Dolanmaz, Dogan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (12) : 2063 - 2068
  • [5] Fixation methods in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review on in vitro biomechanical assessments
    Kuik, K.
    De Ruiter, M. H. T.
    De Lange, J.
    Hoekema, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (01) : 56 - 70
  • [6] In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback
    Oh, Ji-Su
    Kim, Su-Gwan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (02) : 186 - 191
  • [7] Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials
    Ueki, Koichiro
    Ishihara, Yuri
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Moroi, Akinori
    Ikawa, Hiroumi
    Iguchi, Ran
    Kosaka, Akihiko
    Hotta, Asami
    Tsutsui, Takamitsu
    Saida, Yuriko
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (05) : 710 - 716
  • [8] Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Dolanmaz, D
    Uckan, S
    Isik, K
    Saglam, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 42 (02) : 127 - 132
  • [9] Modification of the Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandibular Ramus: Mobilizing Vertical Osteotomy of the Internal Ramus Segment
    Ricard, Daniel
    Ferri, Joel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (08) : 1691 - 1699
  • [10] Assessment of Resorbable and Non-resorbable Fixation Systems in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: An In vitro Study
    Costa, Davani Latarullo
    Torres, Alexandre Machado
    Bergamaschi, Isabela Polesi
    Kluppel, Leandro Eduardo
    de Oliveira, Rogerio Belle
    Blessmann Weber, Joao Batista
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2022, 21 (03) : 779 - 784