Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy

被引:44
作者
Tschirdewahn, Stephan [1 ]
Wiesenfarth, Manuel [2 ]
Bonekamp, David [3 ]
Puellen, Lukas [1 ]
Reis, Henning [4 ]
Panic, Andrej [1 ]
Kesch, Claudia [1 ]
Darr, Christopher [1 ]
Hess, Jochen [1 ]
Giganti, Francesco [5 ,6 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [6 ,7 ]
Guberina, Nika [8 ]
Forsting, Michael [8 ]
Wetter, Axel [8 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [1 ]
Radtke, Jan Philipp [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Biostat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Pathol, Essen, Germany
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[6] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[7] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[8] Univ Hosp Essen, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Essen, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Targeted biopsy; Target saturation; transrectal ultrasound fusion; Detection accuracy of target; saturation biopsy; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsies (TBs) facilitate accurate detection of significant prostate cancer (sPC). However, it remains unclear how many cores should be applied per target. Objective: To assess sPC detection rates of two different target-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-fusion biopsy approaches (TB and target saturation [TS]) compared with extended systematic biopsies (SBs). Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective single-centre outcome of transperineal MRI/TRUS-fusion biopsies of 213 men was evaluated. All men underwent TB with a median of four cores per MRI lesion, followed by a median of 24 SBs, performed by experienced urologists. Cancer and sPC (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2) detection rates were analysed. TB was compared with SB and TS, with nine cores per target, calculated by the Ginsburg scheme and using individual cores of the lesion and its "penumbra". Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Cancer detection rates were calculated for TS, TB, and SB at both lesion and patient level. Combination of SB + TB served as a reference. Statistical differences in prostate cancer (PC) detection between groups were calculated using McNemar's tests with confidence intervals. Results and limitations: TS detected 99% of 134 sPC lesions, which was significantly higher than the detection by TB (87%, p = 0.001) and SB (82%, p < 0.001). SB detected significantly more of the 72 low-risk PC lesions than TB (99% vs 68%, p < 0.001) and 10% (p = 0.15) more than that detected by TS. At a per-patient level, 99% of men harbouring sPC were detected by TS. This was significantly higher than that by TB and SB (89%, p = 0.03 and 81%, p = 0.001, respectively). Limitations include limited generalisability, as a transperineal biopsy route was used.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1307
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Mayerhofer, Christoph
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Nagele, Udo
    Tokas, Theodoros
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 904 - 913
  • [32] Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Kesch, Claudia
    Pepdjonovic, Lana
    Bonekamp, David
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Distler, Florian
    Warren, Anne
    Samel, Christina
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Kastner, Christof
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [33] Saturation target biopsy can overcome the learning curve of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate
    Hsieh, Po-Fan
    Chang, Tian-You
    Lin, Wei-Ching
    Chang, Han
    Chang, Chao-Hsiang
    Huang, Chi-Ping
    Yang, Chi-Rei
    Chen, Wen-Chi
    Chang, Yi-Huei
    Wang, Yu-De
    Huang, Wen-Chin
    Wu, Hsi-Chin
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2022, 18 (06)
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and targeted fusion biopsy for early detection of prostate cancer
    Barnett, Christine L.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Wei, John T.
    Montie, James E.
    Denton, Brian T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [35] Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion transperineal prostate biopsy for prostate cancer: Initial experience at a Middle Eastern tertiary medical centre
    El-Achkar, Adnan
    Al-Mousawy, Mouhammad
    Abou Heidar, Nassib
    Moukaddem, Hisham
    Hussein, Hero
    Mouallem, Nadim
    El-Hajj, Albert
    Bulbul, Muhammad
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 19 (04) : 454 - 459
  • [36] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review
    Valerio, Massimo
    Donaldson, Ian
    Emberton, Mark
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Mozer, Pierre
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 8 - 19
  • [37] Role of targeted biopsy, perilesional biopsy, and random biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis by mpMRI/transrectal ultrasonography fusion biopsy
    Novara, Giacomo
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Zecchini, Giovanni
    Aceti, Alberto
    Pellizzari, Anna
    Ferraioli, Giordana
    Carlesso, Maria
    La Bombarda, Giulia
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Lacognata, Carmelo Salvino
    Lauro, Alberto
    Gardiman, Marina
    Betto, Giovanni
    Zanovello, Nicola
    Moro, Fabrizio Dal
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (11) : 3239 - 3247
  • [38] Prostate cancer detection rate of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Impact of clinical indications on biopsy outcome
    Silecchia, G.
    Selvaggio, O.
    Milillo, P.
    Tewari, A.
    Stallone, G.
    Carrieri, G.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 66 (04): : 205 - 210
  • [39] Learning curve for fusion magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy and three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography segmentation
    Lenfant, Louis
    Beitone, Clement
    Troccaz, Jocelyne
    Roupret, Morgan
    Seisen, Thomas
    Voros, Sandrine
    Mozer, Pierre C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (06) : 709 - 716
  • [40] Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men
    Shoji, Sunao
    Hiraiwa, Shinichiro
    Ogawa, Takahiro
    Kawakami, Masayoshi
    Nakano, Mayura
    Hashida, Kazunobu
    Sato, Yoshinobu
    Hasebe, Terumitsu
    Uchida, Toyoaki
    Tajiri, Takuma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 288 - 294