Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy

被引:44
|
作者
Tschirdewahn, Stephan [1 ]
Wiesenfarth, Manuel [2 ]
Bonekamp, David [3 ]
Puellen, Lukas [1 ]
Reis, Henning [4 ]
Panic, Andrej [1 ]
Kesch, Claudia [1 ]
Darr, Christopher [1 ]
Hess, Jochen [1 ]
Giganti, Francesco [5 ,6 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [6 ,7 ]
Guberina, Nika [8 ]
Forsting, Michael [8 ]
Wetter, Axel [8 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [1 ]
Radtke, Jan Philipp [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Biostat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Pathol, Essen, Germany
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[6] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[7] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[8] Univ Hosp Essen, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Essen, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Targeted biopsy; Target saturation; transrectal ultrasound fusion; Detection accuracy of target; saturation biopsy; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsies (TBs) facilitate accurate detection of significant prostate cancer (sPC). However, it remains unclear how many cores should be applied per target. Objective: To assess sPC detection rates of two different target-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-fusion biopsy approaches (TB and target saturation [TS]) compared with extended systematic biopsies (SBs). Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective single-centre outcome of transperineal MRI/TRUS-fusion biopsies of 213 men was evaluated. All men underwent TB with a median of four cores per MRI lesion, followed by a median of 24 SBs, performed by experienced urologists. Cancer and sPC (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2) detection rates were analysed. TB was compared with SB and TS, with nine cores per target, calculated by the Ginsburg scheme and using individual cores of the lesion and its "penumbra". Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Cancer detection rates were calculated for TS, TB, and SB at both lesion and patient level. Combination of SB + TB served as a reference. Statistical differences in prostate cancer (PC) detection between groups were calculated using McNemar's tests with confidence intervals. Results and limitations: TS detected 99% of 134 sPC lesions, which was significantly higher than the detection by TB (87%, p = 0.001) and SB (82%, p < 0.001). SB detected significantly more of the 72 low-risk PC lesions than TB (99% vs 68%, p < 0.001) and 10% (p = 0.15) more than that detected by TS. At a per-patient level, 99% of men harbouring sPC were detected by TS. This was significantly higher than that by TB and SB (89%, p = 0.03 and 81%, p = 0.001, respectively). Limitations include limited generalisability, as a transperineal biopsy route was used.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1307
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of significant prostate cancer using target saturation in transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography-fusion biopsy: A prospective, randomized comparison to conventional target biopsy
    Saner, Y.
    Wiesenfarth, M.
    Tschirdewahn, S.
    Puellen, L.
    Bonekamp, D.
    Krafft, U.
    Kesch, C.
    Darr, C.
    Forsting, M.
    Umutlu, L.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    Radtke, J. P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1272 - S1272
  • [2] DETECTION OF SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER USING TARGET SATURATION IN TRANSPERINEAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING/TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY-FUSION BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL TARGET BIOPSY
    Saner, Yasemin
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Puellen, Lukas
    Bonekamp, David
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Reis, Henning
    Krafft, Ulrich
    Kesch, Claudia
    Forsting, Michael
    Umutlu, Lale
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E784 - E785
  • [3] DETECTION OF SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER USING TARGET SATURATION IN TRANSPERINEAL MRI/TRUS-FUSION BIOPSY
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Bonekamp, David
    Puellen, Lukas
    Reis, Henning
    Panic, Andrej
    Kesch, Claudia
    Darr, Christopher
    Giganti, Francesco
    Forsting, Michael
    Wetter, Axel
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E853 - E853
  • [4] Transperineal or Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Diamand, Romain
    Guenzel, Karsten
    Mjaess, Georges
    Lefebvre, Yolene
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Fournier, Georges
    Buif, Alexandre-Patrick
    Tahaf, Fayek
    Oderdag, Marco
    Gonterog, Paolo
    Rysankovah, Katerina
    Bernal-Gomezj, Adrian
    Rochej, Jean-Baptiste
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Abou Zahr, Rawad
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Mastrorosaj, Alessandro
    Windisch, Olivier
    Novello, Quentin
    Benamran, Daniel
    Delavar, Gina
    Anract, Julien
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    Halinski, Adam
    Dariane, Charles
    Benijts, Jan
    Assenmacher, Gregoire
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Peltier, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (05): : 805 - 811
  • [5] Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5
    Hakozaki, Yuji
    Matsushima, Hisashi
    Murata, Taro
    Masuda, Tomoko
    Hirai, Yoko
    Oda, Mai
    Kawauchi, Nobuo
    Yokoyama, Munehiro
    Kume, Haruki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 217 - 222
  • [7] Critical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted, Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Transperineal Fusion Biopsy for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Roethke, Matthias C.
    Seidenader, Jonas
    Simpfendoerfer, Tobias
    Boxler, Silvan
    Alammar, Khalid
    Rieker, Philip
    Popeneciu, Valentin I.
    Roth, Wilfried
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (04): : 1380 - 1386
  • [8] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [9] Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Froehner, Michael
    Koch, Rainer
    Wirth, Manfred
    Zastrow, Stefan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (06) : 873 - 879
  • [10] Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia: the 'double-freehand' technique
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Medina, Luis G.
    Lenon, Maria Sarah L.
    Sayegh, Aref S.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Aron, Manju
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Palmer, Suzanne L.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 131 (06) : 770 - 774