Quantifying avoided deforestation in Para: Protected areas, buffer zones and edge effects

被引:19
作者
Jusys, Tomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Balearic Isl, Dept Appl Econ, Cra Valldemossa,Km 7-5, Palma De Mallorca, The Balearic Is, Spain
关键词
Avoided deforestation; Buffer zones; Edge effects; Para; Matching; PROPENSITY SCORE; FORESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnc.2016.05.001
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Percentage of forests saved due to establishment of protected areas is an important piece of information for government institutions and, therefore, is the goal of this study. However, non random location selection bias makes such information directly unobservable. To overcome this problem, propensity score matching was applied. Unlike in previous studies, impact of buffer zone management was assessed by estimating avoided deforestation in buffer zones and park edges. The study area is the state of Para. Overall results revealed that park protection saved 0.72% of protected surface from deforestation during 2000-2004 year period (similar to 2900 km(2) of forests). The highest percentage of avoided deforestation was recorded in protected areas, situated near deforestation hotspots: central part of Eastern Para, alongside Trans-Amazonian highway and on the banks of Amazon River. The findings also suggest that buffer zones tend to reduce deforestation where pressure on forests is lower, but substitution effect takes over in areas of high deforestation pressure (since loggers are prevented from deforesting within conservation units, deforestation in surrounding areas increases). Finally, the study does not find evidence of edge effects in the state of Para. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   How Can We Estimate Buffer Zones of Protected Areas? A Proposal Using Biological Data [J].
Alexandre, Brenda ;
Crouzeilles, Renato ;
Viveiros Grelle, Carlos Eduardo .
NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2010, 8 (02) :165-170
[2]   Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation [J].
Andam, Kwaw S. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo ;
Robalino, Juan A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (42) :16089-16094
[3]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[4]   Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Ichino, Andrea .
STATA JOURNAL, 2002, 2 (04) :358-377
[5]  
Burrough PA., 1998, PRINCIPLES GEOGRAPHI, P190
[6]   Fire as a large-scale edge effect in Amazonian forests [J].
Cochrane, MA ;
Laurance, WF .
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 18 :311-325
[7]   Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years [J].
DeFries, R ;
Hansen, A ;
Newton, AC ;
Hansen, MC .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (01) :19-26
[8]  
GEMU-JRC (Global Environment Monitoring Unit -Joint Research Centre of the European Commission), 2014, TRAVEL TIME MAJOR CI
[9]  
GEOFABRIK, 2014, OPENSTREETMAP DAT EX
[10]  
IIASA (International Institute for Applied System Analysis), 2014, PLAT 28 CLIM SOIL TE