Shoreline position change and the relationship to annual and interannual meteo-oceanographic conditions in Southeastern Brazil

被引:25
作者
Carvalho, Breylla Campos [1 ]
Pacheco Dalbosco, Anna Luiza [2 ]
Guerra, Josefa Varela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Fac Oceanog, Programa Posgrad Oceanog, Rua Sao Francisco Xavier 524, BR-20550900 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Fac Engn Sanitaria & Ambiental, Lab Hidraul Maritima, Campus Univ, BR-88040970 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Landsat imagery; WW3; model; Coastal morphology; El Nino/La Nina teleconnections; Rio de Janeiro sandy beaches; COAST; BEACH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106582
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Historical satellite imagery datasets are commonly used to map coastal behavior over time while correlating it with concurrent meteo-oceanographic conditions. Thus, this study evaluates the shoreline position changes over 60 km of Rio de Janeiro southern coast (SE Brazil) using the integrated analysis of Landsat imagery (Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 8 OLI sensors) and a time series extracted from the WaveWatch III (WW3) model spanning the 1986-2018 period. This first study conducted in the area between the Marambaia barrier island and RecreioBarra da Tijuca beaches aims to correlate morphological changes with wind wave climatology over a 30-year span. The verified interannual variability was particularly correlated with more energetic storm events and coastal erosion during La Nina years. These results agree with and reinforce previous conclusions highlighting an important teleconnection pattern that affects Southern hemisphere beaches. Overall, 18% of the coastline is under erosion, 52% is stable and 30% is advancing, values close to the global average. Moreover, the applied methodology can be easily replicated in any sandy coast around the world, especially where in situ observations are scarce, becoming an important tool for studying complex coastal systems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, SOC PHOTOOPTI INSTRU, DOI DOI 10.1117/12.2255528
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010111857 US GEOL S
  • [3] Extreme oceanographic forcing and coastal response due to the 2015-2016 El Nino
    Barnard, Patrick L.
    Hoover, Daniel
    Hubbard, David M.
    Snyder, Alex
    Ludka, Bonnie C.
    Allan, Jonathan
    Kaminsky, George M.
    Ruggiero, Peter
    Gallien, Timu W.
    Gabel, Laura
    McCandless, Diana
    Weiner, Heather M.
    Cohn, Nicholas
    Anderson, Dylan L.
    Serafin, Katherine A.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [4] Barnard PL, 2015, NAT GEOSCI, V8, P801, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2539, 10.1038/NGEO2539]
  • [5] Batista E. D. M., 2009, Rev. Bras. Geofis, V27, P83
  • [6] Shoreline definition and detection: A review
    Boak, EH
    Turner, IL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 21 (04) : 688 - 703
  • [7] Understanding coastal change using shoreline trend analysis supported by cluster-based segmentation
    Burningham, Helene
    French, Jon
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2017, 282 : 131 - 149
  • [8] Carvalho B.C., 2018, P 2 BRAZ S SAND BEAC
  • [9] Spatial and temporal patterns of shoreline change of a 280-km high-energy disrupted sandy coast from 1950 to 2014: SW France
    Castelle, Bruno
    Guillot, Benoit
    Marieu, Vincent
    Chaumillon, Eric
    Hanquiez, Vincent
    Bujan, Stephane
    Poppeschi, Coline
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2018, 200 : 212 - 223
  • [10] Coutinho N.M., 2007, THESIS