Post-fire landscape evaluations in Eastern Washington, USA: Assessing the work of contemporary wildfires

被引:26
作者
Churchill, Derek J. [1 ]
Jeronimo, Sean M. A. [2 ,3 ]
Hessburg, Paul F. [3 ,4 ]
Cansler, C. Alina [3 ]
Povak, Nicholas A. [4 ,5 ]
Kane, Van R. [3 ]
Lutz, James A. [6 ,7 ]
Larson, Andrew J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Dept Nat Resources, Forest Resiliency Div, MS 47037, Olympia, WA 98504 USA
[2] Resilient Forestry, 3703 S Edmunds St Box 162, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] USDA FS, Pacific Northwest Res Stn, 1133 N Western Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801 USA
[5] USDA FS, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, 2480 Carson Rd, Placerville, CA 95667 USA
[6] Utah State Univ, SJ & Jessie E Quinney Coll Nat Resources, Wildland Resources Dept, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[7] Utah State Univ, Ecol Ctr, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[8] Univ Montana, WA Franke Coll Forestry & Conservat, Dept Forest Management, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
关键词
Wildfire; Restoration; Landscape pattern; Climate adaptation; Fire severity; MIXED-CONIFER FORESTS; PONDEROSA PINE FOREST; SEVERITY FIRE REGIME; NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL; SPATIAL-PATTERNS; WILDLAND FIRE; ECOLOGICAL MEMORY; KLAMATH MOUNTAINS; HISTORICAL RANGE; FUEL REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119796
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
In the western US, wildfires are modifying the structure, composition, and patterns of forested landscapes at rates that far exceed mechanical thinning and prescribed fire treatments. There are conflicting narratives as to whether these wildfires are restoring landscape resilience to future climate and wildfires. To evaluate the landscape-level work of wildfires, we assessed four subwatersheds in eastern Washington, USA that experienced large wildfires in 2014, 2015, or 2017 after more than a century of fire exclusion and extensive timber harvest. We compared preand post-fire landscape conditions to an ecoregion-specific historical (HRV) and future range of variation (FRV) based on empirically established reference conditions derived from a large dataset of historical aerial photo imagery. These four wildfires proved to be a blunt restoration tool, moving some attributes towards more climate-adapted conditions and setting others back. Fires reduced canopy cover and decreased overall tree size and canopy complexity, which moved them into, or slightly outside, the FRV ranges. Moderate- and low-severity fire generally shifted closed-canopy forest structure to open-canopy classes. Patches of high-severity fire shifted patterns of forest, woodland, grassland, and shrubland towards or beyond the HRV ranges and within the FRV ranges by increasing the total area and size of non-forest patches. However, large patches of high-severity fire in dry and moist mixed-conifer forests homogenized landscape patterns beyond FRV ranges towards simplified conditions dominated by non-forest vegetation types. Fires realigned and reconnected landscape patterns with the topo-edaphic template in some cases, but pre-existing fragmentation and spatial mismatches were compounded in many others. Patches of large-tree, closed-canopy forest were reduced by high-severity fire, and the potential to restore more climate-adapted large-tree, open-canopy forest was lost. Re-establishing landscape patterns with desired patch sizes of forest, in particular patches with large trees, will take many decades to centuries and may not occur in drier locations or where seed trees are no longer present. While large wildfires burning during extreme fire weather conditions can move some attributes towards HRV and FRV ranges, intentionally planned mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments that are integrated with strategic wildfire response will better prepare and adapt landscapes for future wildfires and climate.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 155 条
[91]  
McGarigal K., 2018, RMRSGTR385 USDA FOR
[92]   Fuel mass and stand structure 13 years after logging of a severely burned ponderosa pine forest in northeastern Oregon, USA [J].
McIver, James D. ;
Ottmar, Roger .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 424 :505-518
[93]   Rethinking resilience to wildfire [J].
McWethy, David B. ;
Schoennagel, Tania ;
Higuera, Philip E. ;
Krawchuk, Meg ;
Harvey, Brian J. ;
Metcalf, Elizabeth C. ;
Schultz, Courtney ;
Miller, Carol ;
Metcalf, Alexander L. ;
Buma, Brian ;
Virapongse, Arika ;
Kulig, Judith C. ;
Stedman, Richard C. ;
Ratajczak, Zak ;
Nelson, Cara R. ;
Kolden, Crystal .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (09) :797-804
[94]   Fire Refugia: What Are They, and Why Do They Matter for Global Change? [J].
Meddens, Arjan J. H. ;
Kolden, Crystal A. ;
Lutz, James A. ;
Smith, Alistair M. S. ;
Cansler, C. Alina ;
Abatzoglou, John T. ;
Meigs, Garrett W. ;
Downing, William M. ;
Krawchuk, Meg A. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2018, 68 (12) :944-954
[95]   Influence of topography and fuels on fire refugia probability under varying fire weather conditions in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA [J].
Meigs, Garrett W. ;
Dunn, Christopher J. ;
Parks, Sean A. ;
Krawchuk, Meg A. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2020, 50 (07) :636-647
[96]  
Meyer M.D., 2021, GEN TECHNICAL REPORT
[97]  
Moritz MA, 2011, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V213, P51, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0301-8_3
[98]   Characteristics and metrics of resilient forests in the Sierra de San Pedro Martir, Mexico [J].
Murphy, Julia S. ;
York, Robert ;
Huerta, Hiram Rivera ;
Stephens, Scott L. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 482
[99]  
North M., 2009, General Technical Report - Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service
[100]   Pyrosilviculture Needed for Landscape Resilience of Dry Western United States Forests [J].
North, M. P. ;
York, R. A. ;
Collins, B. M. ;
Hurteau, M. D. ;
Jones, G. M. ;
Knapp, E. E. ;
Kobziar, L. ;
McCann, H. ;
Meyer, M. D. ;
Stephens, S. L. ;
Tompkins, R. E. ;
Tubbesing, C. L. .
JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2021, 119 (05) :520-544