Biological processes for treatment of landfill leachate

被引:115
|
作者
Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lo, Waihung [1 ,2 ]
Chan, G. [1 ,2 ]
Sillanpaa, Mika E. T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Biol & Chem Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Lo Ka Chung Ctr Nat Anticanc Drug Dev, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm Sci, Lab Appl Environm Chem, FI-50100 Mikkeli, Finland
[4] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Fac Technol, FI-50100 Lappeenranta, Finland
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2010年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; LIGHT-EMITTING-DIODES; SANITARY-LANDFILL; ANAEROBIC TREATMENT; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; NITROGEN REMOVAL; AMMONIA REMOVAL; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; WATER-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1039/c0em00076k
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This review presents an overview with critical analysis of the technical applicability of biological treatments for landfill leachate. A particular focus is given to activated sludge (AS), sequencing batch reactors (SBR), aerated lagoons (AL), and upflow anaerobic sludge blankets (UASB). Their advantages and limitations in application are evaluated. Selected information is presented such as pH, hydraulic retention time (HRT), organic loading rate (OLR), characteristics of leachate and treatment performance. It is evident from the literature survey of 188 papers (1976-2010) that none of the individual biological treatments presented is universally applicable for removing recalcitrant contaminants from leachate. Among the biological treatments reviewed, AS, SBR and UASB are the most frequently applied. These treatments are effective not only to remove over 90% of COD with a concentration ranging from 3500-26 000 mg L-1, but also to achieve 80% of NH3-N removal with a concentration ranging from 100-1000 mg L-1. A combination of physico-chemical and biological treatment into an integrated process is effective for leachate treatment. Almost complete removal of COD and NH3-N was reported for combined reverse osmosis (RO) and UASB with an initial COD concentration of 35 000 mg L-1 and NH3-N concentration of 1600 mg L-1. Integrated Fenton's oxidation and AS could achieve about 98% and 99% of COD and NH3-N removal, respectively, with initial COD and NH3-N concentrations of 7000 mg L-1 and 1800 mg L-1. Overall, the selection of the most suitable treatment for leachate depends on its characteristics, technical applicability and potential constraints, effluent limit required, cost-effectiveness, regulatory requirements and long-term environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:2032 / 2047
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A pilot-scale study on the treatment of landfill leachate by a composite biological system under low dissolved oxygen conditions: Performance and microbial community
    Song, Jianyang
    Zhang, Wei
    Gao, Junfeng
    Hu, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Chenlu
    He, Qiulai
    Yang, Fei
    Wang, Hongyu
    Wang, Xueyu
    Zhan, Xiang
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 296
  • [42] A review of the biological treatment of leachate: Available technologies and future requirements for the circular economy implementation
    Ilmasari, Dhaneswara
    Kamyab, Hesam
    Yuzir, Ali
    Riyadi, Fatimah Azizah
    Khademi, Tayebeh
    Al-Qaim, Fouad Fadhil
    Kirpichnikova, Irina
    Krishnan, Santhana
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 187
  • [43] Vertical flow wetlands and hybrid systems for the treatment of landfill leachate
    Camano Silvestrini, Nahuel Ernesto
    Ricardo Hadad, Hernan
    Alejandra Maine, Maria
    Cristina Sanchez, Gabriela
    del Carmen Pedro, Maria
    Ester Caffaratti, Sandra
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (08) : 8019 - 8027
  • [44] Adsorption - Membrane process for treatment of stabilized municipal landfill leachate
    Zielinska, Magdalena
    Kulikowska, Dorota
    Stanczak, Marcin
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 114 : 174 - 182
  • [45] Treatment of old landfill leachate with high ammonium content using aerobic granular sludge
    Ren, Yanan
    Ferraz, Fernanda
    Kang, Abbass Jafari
    Yuan, Qiuyan
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 11
  • [46] Progress and prospects in mitigation of landfill leachate pollution: Risk, pollution potential, treatment and challenges
    Wijekoon, Prabuddhi
    Koliyabandara, Pabasari Arundathi
    Cooray, Asitha T.
    Lam, Su Shiung
    Athapattu, Bandunee C. L.
    Vithanage, Meththika
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2022, 421
  • [47] Evaluation of acute toxicity, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of landfill leachate treated by biological lagoon and advanced oxidation processes
    Klauck, Claudia Regina
    Giacobbo, Alexandre
    Lorenz de Oliveira, Erlon Diego
    da Silva, Luciano Basso
    Siqueira Rodrigues, Marco Antonio
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (06): : 6188 - 6193
  • [48] Sanitary landfill leachate treatment using combined solar photo-Fenton and biological oxidation processes at pre-industrial scale
    Silva, Tania F. C. V.
    Silva, M. Elisabete F.
    Cristina Cunha-Queda, A.
    Fonseca, Amelia
    Saraiva, Isabel
    Boaventura, Rui A. R.
    Vilar, Vitor J. P.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 228 : 850 - 866
  • [49] Sustainable treatment of landfill leachate: a review on methods
    Al-Balushi, F.
    Ibrahim, O.
    Rajamohan, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (14) : 9281 - 9296
  • [50] Treatment of landfill leachate with different techniques: an overview
    Mojiri, Amin
    Zhou, John L.
    Ratnaweera, Harsha
    Ohashi, Akiyoshi
    Ozaki, Noriatsu
    Kindaichi, Tomonori
    Asakura, Hiroshi
    WATER REUSE, 2021, 11 (01) : 66 - 96