Biological processes for treatment of landfill leachate

被引:115
|
作者
Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lo, Waihung [1 ,2 ]
Chan, G. [1 ,2 ]
Sillanpaa, Mika E. T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Biol & Chem Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Lo Ka Chung Ctr Nat Anticanc Drug Dev, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm Sci, Lab Appl Environm Chem, FI-50100 Mikkeli, Finland
[4] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Fac Technol, FI-50100 Lappeenranta, Finland
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2010年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; LIGHT-EMITTING-DIODES; SANITARY-LANDFILL; ANAEROBIC TREATMENT; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; NITROGEN REMOVAL; AMMONIA REMOVAL; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; WATER-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1039/c0em00076k
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This review presents an overview with critical analysis of the technical applicability of biological treatments for landfill leachate. A particular focus is given to activated sludge (AS), sequencing batch reactors (SBR), aerated lagoons (AL), and upflow anaerobic sludge blankets (UASB). Their advantages and limitations in application are evaluated. Selected information is presented such as pH, hydraulic retention time (HRT), organic loading rate (OLR), characteristics of leachate and treatment performance. It is evident from the literature survey of 188 papers (1976-2010) that none of the individual biological treatments presented is universally applicable for removing recalcitrant contaminants from leachate. Among the biological treatments reviewed, AS, SBR and UASB are the most frequently applied. These treatments are effective not only to remove over 90% of COD with a concentration ranging from 3500-26 000 mg L-1, but also to achieve 80% of NH3-N removal with a concentration ranging from 100-1000 mg L-1. A combination of physico-chemical and biological treatment into an integrated process is effective for leachate treatment. Almost complete removal of COD and NH3-N was reported for combined reverse osmosis (RO) and UASB with an initial COD concentration of 35 000 mg L-1 and NH3-N concentration of 1600 mg L-1. Integrated Fenton's oxidation and AS could achieve about 98% and 99% of COD and NH3-N removal, respectively, with initial COD and NH3-N concentrations of 7000 mg L-1 and 1800 mg L-1. Overall, the selection of the most suitable treatment for leachate depends on its characteristics, technical applicability and potential constraints, effluent limit required, cost-effectiveness, regulatory requirements and long-term environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:2032 / 2047
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biological Treatment, Advanced Oxidation and Membrane Separation for Landfill Leachate Treatment: A Review
    Kamal, Arailym
    Makhatova, Ardak
    Yergali, Bakzhan
    Baidullayeva, Aigerim
    Satayeva, Aliya
    Kim, Jong
    Inglezakis, Vassilis J.
    Poulopoulos, Stavros G.
    Arkhangelsky, Elizabeth
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [22] Sanitary Landfill Leachate Treatment with Double Chamber Anaerobic Reactor in Series with Constructed Wetland
    Galindo Montero, Andres A.
    Pimienta Serrano, Estefany V.
    Perez Montiel, J. I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (03): : 695 - 712
  • [23] Hazardous waste landfill leachate treatment by combined chemical and biological techniques
    Kattel, Eneliis
    Kivi, Arthur
    Klein, Kati
    Tenno, Taavo
    Dulova, Niina
    Trapido, Marina
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (28) : 13236 - 13245
  • [24] Mature landfill leachate treatment in a biological filter using scoria as media
    Jojoa-Unigarro, German D.
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Simon
    Gonzalez-Barcelo, Oscar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED WATER ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH, 2023, 11 (02): : 221 - 230
  • [25] Assessment of dynamic membrane filtration for biological treatment of old landfill leachate
    Saleem, Mubbshir
    Spagni, Alessandro
    Alibardi, Luca
    Bertucco, Alberto
    Lavagnolo, Maria Cristina
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 213 : 27 - 35
  • [26] Landfill leachate biological treatment: perspective for the aerobic granular sludge technology
    da Silva, Vicente E. P. S. G.
    Rollemberg, Silvio L. de S.
    Santos, Sara G. da S. E.
    Silva, Tania F. C., V
    Vilar, Vitor J. P.
    dos Santos, Andre B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (30) : 45150 - 45170
  • [27] Evaluation of biological landfill leachate treatment incorporating struvite precipitation and powdered activated carbon addition
    Jaafarzadeh, Nematallah
    Jorfi, Sahand
    Kalantary, Roshanak Rezaei
    Hashempour, Yalda
    Soltani, Reza Darvishi Cheshme
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (08) : 759 - 766
  • [28] AnMBR technology for landfill leachate treatment: a framework towards improved performance
    Issa, Lea
    El Kik, Olga
    El-Fadel, Mutasem
    REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 21 (02) : 517 - 538
  • [29] Membrane bioreactors vs conventional biological treatment of landfill leachate: a brief review
    Alvarez-Vazquez, H
    Jefferson, B
    Judd, SJ
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 79 (10) : 1043 - 1049
  • [30] Treatment of landfill waste, leachate and landfill gas: A review
    Hecham Omar
    Sohrab Rohani
    Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9 : 15 - 32