Discovery of Biomarker Genes from Earthworm Microarray Data by Discriminant Analysis and Clustering

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Ying [1 ]
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Chaoyang [1 ]
Perkins, Edward J. [2 ]
Gong, Ping [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39401 USA
[2] US Army Engn Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
[3] SpecPro Inc, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
来源
2009 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND INTELLIGENT COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS | 2009年
关键词
Biomarker; Classification; Decision tree; Support vector machine; Clustering; Earthworm Microarray; CANCER CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/IJCBS.2009.134
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Monitoring, assessment and prediction of environmental risks that chemicals pose demand rapid and accurate diagnostic assays. One important goal of microarray experiments is to discover novel biomarkers for toxicity evaluation. A variety of toxicological effects have been associated with explosive compounds 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 1,3.5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (RDX). Here we developed a discriminant analysis and cluster (DAC) pipeline to analyze a 248-array dataset with 15,208 non-redundant earthworm (Eisenia fetida) gene probes on each array. Our objective was to identify biomarker genes that can separate earthworm samples into three groups: control (untreated), TNT-treated, and RDX-treated. First, the class comparison statistical algorithm implemented in BRB-ArrayTools was used to infer a total of 869 genes that significantly changed relative to controls as a result of exposure to TNT or RDX at various concentrations for 4 or 14 days. Then, nine tree-based supervised machine learning algorithms were applied to generate classification rules and a set of 286 classifier genes. These classifier genes were ranked by their overall weight of significance in the nine classification methods, and were used to build support vector machines (SVM). A SVM containing all 286 classifier genes had the highest classification accuracy (91.5%). Results of unsupervised clustering show that the use of the top 100 classifier genes can assign the largest number of the 248 worm samples into the three reference clusters obtained by using all the 14,188 filtered genes, suggesting that these top-ranked genes may be potential candidates for biomarkers. This study demonstrates that the DAC pipeline can be used to identify a small set of biomarker genes from high dimensional datasets and generate a reliable SVM classification model for multiple classes.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ILRC: a hybrid biomarker discovery algorithm based on improved L1 regularization and clustering in microarray data
    Yu, Kun
    Xie, Weidong
    Wang, Linjie
    Li, Wei
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [2] Combined Clustering Methods for Microarray Data Analysis
    Malutan, Raul
    Gomez Vilda, Pedro
    Borda, Monica
    INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING: STEPS TOWARDS BREAKTHROUGH INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 8-9 : 508 - +
  • [3] ILRC: a hybrid biomarker discovery algorithm based on improved L1 regularization and clustering in microarray data
    Kun Yu
    Weidong Xie
    Linjie Wang
    Wei Li
    BMC Bioinformatics, 22
  • [4] Common Subcluster Mining in Microarray Data for Molecular Biomarker Discovery
    Sadhu, Arnab
    Bhattacharyya, Balaram
    INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-COMPUTATIONAL LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 11 (03) : 348 - 359
  • [5] A Hybrid Approach for Biomarker Discovery from Microarray Gene Expression Data for Cancer Classification
    Peng, Yanxiong
    Li, Wenyuan
    Liu, Ying
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2006, 2 : 301 - 311
  • [6] Proteomic profile analysis and biomarker discovery from mass spectra using independent component analysis combined with uncorrelated linear discriminant analysis
    Zhang, Mingjin
    Tong, Peijin
    Wang, Wenming
    Geng, Jinpei
    Du, Yiping
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2011, 105 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [7] Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data Clustering using NMF, Spectral Clustering, Kmeans, and GMM
    Mirzal, Andri
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 19 (02) : 1173 - 1192
  • [8] Determining Potential Yeast Longevity Genes via PPI Networks and Microarray Data Clustering Analysis
    Chen, Bernard
    Doolabh, Roshan
    Tang, Fusheng
    2013 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA 2013), VOL 1, 2013, : 370 - 373
  • [9] A two-stage gene selection method for biomarker discovery from microarray data for cancer classification
    Shukla, Alok Kumar
    Singh, Pradeep
    Vardhan, Manu
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2018, 183 : 47 - 58
  • [10] Model-based clustering, classification, and discriminant analysis of data with mixed type
    Browne, Ryan P.
    McNicholas, Paul D.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2012, 142 (11) : 2976 - 2984