Social exclusion and well-being among older adults in rural and urban areas

被引:60
作者
Dahlberg, Lena [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McKee, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalarna Univ, Sch Educ Hlth & Social Studies, Falun, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Aging Res Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Older people; Social exclusion; Well-being; Quality of life; Life satisfaction; Community; Rural; Urban; Neighbourhood; AGING IN-PLACE; NORTHERN-IRELAND; PEOPLE; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; AUSTRALIA; ENGLAND; EUROPE; COHORT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.archger.2018.08.007
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Social exclusion (SE) is a process that limits participation in society across life domains, and is associated with poor quality of life. Neighbourhood exclusion has been identified as particularly important for older adults. This paper examines the association between SE and well-being in older adults from urban and rural areas, focusing on neighbourhood exclusion. Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey design with a stratified sampling frame, participants (aged 65+) from rural (n = 628) and urban (n = 627) areas of Barnsley, United Kingdom, completed a questionnaire containing indicators of five SE domains: civic activity, material resources, social relationships, services and neighbourhood. Sequential multiple regression models were developed for 1) total sample; 2) rural areas; and 3) urban areas, with well-being regressed on SE indicators after controlling for self-reported health. Results: SE indicators explained 13.4% of the variance in well-being in the total sample (of which neighbourhood exclusion explained 1.2%); corresponding figures for the rural model were 13.8% (3.8%) and for the urban model 18.0% (1.7%); the addition of neighbourhood exclusion significantly improved all three models. Five SE indicators were significant in the rural model, compared with seven in the urban model, with four common to both. Discussion: Neighbourhood exclusion explained more variance in well-being in rural than urban areas, whereas exclusion from services explained more variance in urban than rural areas. Area characteristics and the role of neighbourhood should be considered in policy initiatives to reduce SE and promote well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 184
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [11] Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity
    Diener, Ed
    Chan, Micaela Y.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2011, 3 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [12] Promoting social inclusion? The impact of village services on the lives of older people living in rural England
    Dwyer, Peter
    Hardill, Irene
    [J]. AGEING & SOCIETY, 2011, 31 : 243 - 264
  • [13] Neighbourhood cohesion and mental wellbeing among older adults: A mixed methods approach
    Elliott, Jane
    Gale, Catharine R.
    Parsons, Samantha
    Kuh, Diana
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 107 : 44 - 51
  • [14] European Commission, 2013, EUR 2020 STRAT EUR U
  • [15] European Commission, 2011, EUR PLATF POV SOC EX
  • [16] European Social Survey, 2004, SOURC QUEST ROUND 2
  • [17] Neighbourhood environment and positive mental health in older people: The Hertfordshire Cohort Study
    Gale, Catharine R.
    Dennison, Elaine M.
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Sayer, Avan Aihie
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2011, 17 (04) : 867 - 874
  • [18] Natural neighborhood networks - Important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place
    Gardner, Paula J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES, 2011, 25 (03) : 263 - 271
  • [19] The impact of age, place, aging in place, and attachment to place on the well-being of the over 50s in England
    Gilleard, Chris
    Hyde, Martin
    Higgs, Paul
    [J]. RESEARCH ON AGING, 2007, 29 (06) : 590 - 605
  • [20] Levitas R., 2007, The Multidimensional Analysis Of Exclusion