Social exclusion and well-being among older adults in rural and urban areas

被引:60
作者
Dahlberg, Lena [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McKee, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalarna Univ, Sch Educ Hlth & Social Studies, Falun, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Aging Res Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Older people; Social exclusion; Well-being; Quality of life; Life satisfaction; Community; Rural; Urban; Neighbourhood; AGING IN-PLACE; NORTHERN-IRELAND; PEOPLE; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; AUSTRALIA; ENGLAND; EUROPE; COHORT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.archger.2018.08.007
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Social exclusion (SE) is a process that limits participation in society across life domains, and is associated with poor quality of life. Neighbourhood exclusion has been identified as particularly important for older adults. This paper examines the association between SE and well-being in older adults from urban and rural areas, focusing on neighbourhood exclusion. Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey design with a stratified sampling frame, participants (aged 65+) from rural (n = 628) and urban (n = 627) areas of Barnsley, United Kingdom, completed a questionnaire containing indicators of five SE domains: civic activity, material resources, social relationships, services and neighbourhood. Sequential multiple regression models were developed for 1) total sample; 2) rural areas; and 3) urban areas, with well-being regressed on SE indicators after controlling for self-reported health. Results: SE indicators explained 13.4% of the variance in well-being in the total sample (of which neighbourhood exclusion explained 1.2%); corresponding figures for the rural model were 13.8% (3.8%) and for the urban model 18.0% (1.7%); the addition of neighbourhood exclusion significantly improved all three models. Five SE indicators were significant in the rural model, compared with seven in the urban model, with four common to both. Discussion: Neighbourhood exclusion explained more variance in well-being in rural than urban areas, whereas exclusion from services explained more variance in urban than rural areas. Area characteristics and the role of neighbourhood should be considered in policy initiatives to reduce SE and promote well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 184
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DEFR CLASS LOC AUTH
  • [2] [Anonymous], AN MEAS SOC INCL GLO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, SUR START LAT LIF EN
  • [5] Barnes M., 2006, The social exclusion of older people: Evidence from the first wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), Final report
  • [6] Becker E., 2009, Understanding the risks of social exclusion across the life course: Older age
  • [7] Experiences of neighbourhood exclusion and inclusion among older people living in deprived inner-city areas in Belgium and England
    Buffel, Tine
    Phillipson, Chris
    Scharf, Thomas
    [J]. AGEING & SOCIETY, 2013, 33 : 89 - 109
  • [8] Burns Victoria F, 2012, J Aging Res, V2012, P148287, DOI 10.1155/2012/148287
  • [9] Council of European Union, 2004, JOINT REP COMM COUNC
  • [10] Correlates of social and emotional loneliness in older people: evidence from an English community study
    Dahlberg, Lena
    McKee, Kevin J.
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 18 (04) : 504 - 514