Shopper response to bundle promotions for packaged goods

被引:54
作者
Foubert, Bram [1 ]
Gijsbrechts, Els
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Dept Mkt, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.44.4.647
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Bundle promotions-the practice of granting consumers a discount when they buy a certain number of units from a designated range of stockkeeping units-have gained popularity among manufacturers and retailers. In this research, the authors investigate the purchase effects of bundle promotions for a category of packaged goods. Contrary to intuition, they find that promotional bundles are far more effective at inducing switching than at boosting category sales. The strong switching effects result from two mechanisms: (1) Stockkeeping units that are part of a bundle promotion appear to reinforce each other's choice probability, and (2) the bundle discount tends to attract consumers even if they do not buy enough to qualify for the price reduction. The weak category effects follow from the notion that the purchase quantity requirement is often too stringent to make consumers buy earlier and/or more in the category. The authors develop incidence, quantity, and choice models that incorporate the intricate bundle mechanisms, and they use simulations to contrast the sales impact of bundle and traditional per-unit promotions. On the 'basis of the model estimates, they present managerial implications and tentative guidelines for optimal bundle design.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 662
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   COMMODITY BUNDLING AND BURDEN OF MONOPOLY [J].
ADAMS, WJ ;
YELLEN, JL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 90 (03) :475-498
[2]   The effect of promotion on consumption: Buying more and consuming it faster [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (03) :390-398
[3]  
AITCHISON J, 1989, BIOMETRIKA, V76, P643
[4]   A choice model for packaged goods: Dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts [J].
Allenby, GM ;
Shively, TS ;
Yang, S ;
Garratt, MJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (01) :95-108
[5]   Bundling and competition on the Internet [J].
Bakos, Y ;
Brynjolfsson, E .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2000, 19 (01) :63-82
[6]   The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization [J].
Bell, DR ;
Chiang, JW ;
Padmanabhan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :504-526
[7]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[8]  
Bucklin RE, 1998, J FORECASTING, V17, P281, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199806/07)17:3/4<281::AID-FOR697>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-A
[10]   A 2-STATE MODEL OF PURCHASE INCIDENCE AND BRAND CHOICE [J].
BUCKLIN, RE ;
LATTIN, JM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1991, 10 (01) :24-39