Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics

被引:163
作者
Fryxell, John M.
Mosser, Anna
Sinclair, Anthony R. E.
Packer, Craig
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature06177
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Theoretical ecology is largely founded on the principle of mass action, in which uncoordinated populations of predators and prey move in a random and well-mixed fashion across a featureless landscape. The conceptual core of this body of theory is the functional response, predicting the rate of prey consumption by individual predators as a function of predator and/or prey densities(1-5). This assumption is seriously violated in many ecosystems in which predators and/or prey form social groups. Here we develop a new set of group-dependent functional responses to consider the ecological implications of sociality and apply the model to the Serengeti ecosystem. All of the prey species typically captured by Serengeti lions (Panthera leo) are gregarious, exhibiting nonlinear relationships between prey-group density and population density. The observed patterns of group formation profoundly reduce food intake rates below the levels expected under random mixing, having as strong an impact on intake rates as the seasonal migratory behaviour of the herbivores. A dynamical system model parameterized for the Serengeti ecosystem (using wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) as a well-studied example) shows that grouping strongly stabilizes interactions between lions and wildebeest. Our results suggest that social groups rather than individuals are the basic building blocks around which predator-prey interactions should be modelled and that group formation may provide the underlying stability of many ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / U4
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?
    Abrams, PA
    Ginzburg, LR
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (08) : 337 - 341
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, Population Biology Concepts and Models
  • [3] COUPLING IN PREDATOR PREY DYNAMICS - RATIO-DEPENDENCE
    ARDITI, R
    GINZBURG, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1989, 139 (03) : 311 - 326
  • [4] THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY IN POPULATION-DYNAMICS
    CANTRELL, RS
    COSNER, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (04) : 315 - 338
  • [5] Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators
    Cosner, C
    DeAngelis, DL
    Ault, JS
    Olson, DB
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 56 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [6] Donalson DD, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P2492, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2492:PDASSE]2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] PREY CAPTURE BY AFRICAN LION
    ELLIOTT, JP
    COWAN, IM
    HOLLING, CS
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1977, 55 (11): : 1811 - 1828
  • [9] WHY ARE MIGRATORY UNGULATES SO ABUNDANT
    FRYXELL, JM
    GREEVER, J
    SINCLAIR, ARE
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 131 (06) : 781 - 798
  • [10] COOPERATION IN MALE LIONS - KINSHIP, RECIPROCITY OR MUTUALISM
    GRINNELL, J
    PACKER, C
    PUSEY, AE
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 49 (01) : 95 - 105