A formal feasibility study of sublingual methadone for breakthrough cancer pain

被引:19
作者
Hagen, Neil A. [1 ,2 ]
Moulin, Dwight E. [3 ]
Brasher, Penny M. A. [4 ]
Biondo, Patricia D. [1 ]
Eliasziw, Misha [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Watanabe, Sharon M. [7 ]
Stiles, Carla R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Alberta Hlth Serv Canc Care, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Div Palliat Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, London Reg Canc Program Clin Neurol Sci & Oncol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Evaluat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Alberta, Div Palliat Care Med, Dept Oncol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Breakthrough cancer pain; feasibility study; methadone; sublingual; PALLIATIVE-CARE; ELECTRONIC DIARIES; OPEN-LABEL; CROSSOVER; TRIALS; PAPER; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; DIFFICULT; HOSPICE;
D O I
10.1177/0269216310375999
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted a feasibility study of sublingual methadone for breakthrough cancer pain, to determine whether a larger, randomized trial was warranted, and to identify a study design that would be likely to succeed. From approximately 1930 patients in the initial pool, nine patients were enrolled. Five patients completed the study, generating data on 83 discrete episodes of breakthrough cancer pain at optimal dose. Mean pain intensity dropped by 1.7 points (on a 10 point numerical scale) within 10 min of sublingual methadone administration, and by 3.2 points after 15 min. No serious or severe toxicity was encountered. Based on the results of this feasibility study, a larger randomized clinical trial of sublingual methadone for breakthrough cancer pain using this trial model would not be successful. Extensive information obtained from small numbers of carefully studied patients provides proof of concept that sublingual methadone is effective, safe, and well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 706
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Bruera Eduardo, 2002, J Palliat Med, V5, P127, DOI 10.1089/10966210252785097
[2]  
Cleary J F, 1997, Semin Oncol, V24, pS16
[3]   Recruiting into palliative care trials: lessons learnt from a feasibility study [J].
Cook, AM ;
Finlay, IG ;
Butler-Keating, RJ .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 16 (02) :163-165
[4]   Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data [J].
Dale, Oystein ;
Hagen, Kaare Birger .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) :8-17
[5]   Determination of free and protein-bound methadone and its major metabolite EDDP: Enantiomeric separation and quantitation by LC/MS/MS [J].
Etter, ML ;
George, S ;
Graybiel, K ;
Eichhorst, J ;
Lehotay, DC .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 38 (12) :1095-1102
[6]   Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult? [J].
Ewing, G ;
Rogers, M ;
Barclay, S ;
Mccabe, J ;
Martin, A ;
Todd, C .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 18 (05) :452-459
[7]   Characterization of breakthrough pain by hospice patients and their caregivers [J].
Fine, PG ;
Busch, MA .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1998, 16 (03) :179-183
[8]   Characterization of the early pharmacodynamic profile of oral methadone for cancer-related breakthrough pain: A pilot study [J].
Fisher, K ;
Stiles, C ;
Hagen, NA .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (06) :619-625
[9]   Electronic pain diary: A randomized crossover study [J].
Gaertner, J ;
Elsner, F ;
Pollmann-Dahmen, K ;
Radbruch, L ;
Sabatowski, R .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (03) :259-267
[10]   Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? [J].
Grande, GE ;
Todd, CJ .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 14 (01) :69-74