Life cycle assessment of four municipal solid waste management scenarios in China

被引:173
作者
Hong, Jinglan [1 ]
Li, Xiangzhi [2 ]
Cui Zhaojie [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
IMPACT; EMISSIONS; OPTIONS; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.038
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment was carried out to estimate the environmental impact of municipal solid waste. Four scenarios mostly used in China were compared to assess the influence of various technologies on environment: (1) landfill, (2) incineration, (3) composting plus landfill, and (4) composting plus incineration. In all scenarios, the technologies significantly contribute to global warming and increase the adverse impact of non-carcinogens on the environment. The technologies played only a small role in the impact of carcinogens, respiratory inorganics, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and non-renewable energy. Similarly, the influence of the technologies on the way other elements affect the environment was ignorable. Specifically, the direct emissions from the operation processes involved played an important role in most scenarios except for incineration, while potential impact generated from transport, infrastructure and energy consumption were quite small. In addition, in the global warming category, highest potential impact was observed in landfill because of the direct methane gas emissions. Electricity recovery from methane gas was the key factor for reducing the potential impact of global warming. Therefore, increasing the use of methane gas to recover electricity is highly recommended to reduce the adverse impact of landfills on the environment. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2362 / 2369
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Fate of heavy metals during municipal solid waste incineration [J].
Abanades, S ;
Flamant, G ;
Gagnepain, B ;
Gauthier, D .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2002, 20 (01) :55-68
[2]  
[Anonymous], EC DAT V2 0 FIN REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSM 3
[4]   The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life cycle assessment study [J].
Arena, U ;
Mastellone, ML ;
Perugini, F .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2003, 96 (1-3) :207-222
[5]   Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey [J].
Banar, Mufide ;
Cokaygil, Zerrin ;
Ozkan, Aysun .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (01) :54-62
[6]  
BJARNADOTTIR HJ, 2002, 517 TR NORDT
[7]   Recycling revisited -: life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies [J].
Björklund, A ;
Finnveden, G .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2005, 44 (04) :309-317
[8]  
*BREFS, 2006, INT POLL PREV CONTR
[9]   Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand [J].
Chaya, Wirawat ;
Gheewala, Shabbir H. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (15) :1463-1468
[10]   Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: A comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature [J].
Cleary, Julian .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 35 (08) :1256-1266