Understanding Sample Surveys: Selective Learning about Social Science Research Methods

被引:6
|
作者
Currin-Percival, Mary [1 ]
Johnson, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812 USA
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
EDUCATION; SOCIOLOGY; STYLES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1017/S1049096510000776
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We investigate differences in what students learn about survey methodology in a class on public opinion presented in two critically different ways: with the inclusion or exclusion of an original research project using a random-digit-dial telephone survey. Using a quasi-experimental design and data obtained from pretests and posttests in two public opinion courses, we test the hypothesis that students who participate in an original survey research project will have a stronger understanding of survey research methods than students who do not. To better assess the effect of the active learning element of the course, we estimate average treatment effects on the students who participated in the original survey project using nearest neighbor matching (Abadie et al. 2004) with student scores on a pretest. We find evidence of modest improvement in learning of survey methods in the course featuring the original survey research project; however, the major finding here is that a course featuring this kind of opportunity appeals to a different kind of student than a course that allows participants to stay closer to the classroom and library instead of the social science research laboratory. This discovery may have important implications for our understanding of the effects of active learning opportunities in other types of elective courses.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 540
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Student perspectives on learning research methods in the social sciences
    Nind, Melanie
    Holmes, Michelle
    Insenga, Michela
    Lewthwaite, Sarah
    Sutton, Cordelia
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 25 (07) : 797 - 811
  • [2] Team Dynamics and Learning Opportunities in Social Science Research Teams
    McGinn, Michelle K.
    Niemczyk, Ewelina K.
    ALBERTA JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 66 (04): : 364 - 386
  • [3] Digital Methods: An STS Challenge to Methodological Digitization in Social Science Research
    Sharifzadeh, Rahman
    SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] Factors Influencing Achievement in Undergraduate Social Science Research Methods Courses: A Mixed Methods Analysis
    Markle, Gail
    TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 2017, 45 (02) : 105 - 115
  • [5] Students as Producers: Designing Games to Teach Social Science Research Methods and Ethics
    Gerodetti, Natalia
    Nixon, Darren
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING (ECGBL 2014), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2014, : 143 - 150
  • [6] The Playground Game: Inquiry-Based Learning About Research Methods and Statistics
    Westera, Wim
    Slootmaker, Aad
    Kurvers, Hub
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING (ECGBL 2014), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2014, : 620 - 627
  • [7] Adapting Experiential Learning Opportunities: A Political Science Research Methods Course Case Study
    Currin-Percival, Mary
    Gulahmad, Sonnia
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2021, 17 : 311 - 325
  • [8] Understanding social forces involved in diabetes outcomes: a systems science approach to quality-of-life research
    David W. Lounsbury
    Gary B. Hirsch
    Chawntel Vega
    Carolyn E. Schwartz
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 959 - 969
  • [9] Understanding social forces involved in diabetes outcomes: a systems science approach to quality-of-life research
    Lounsbury, David W.
    Hirsch, Gary B.
    Vega, Chawntel
    Schwartz, Carolyn E.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (03) : 959 - 969
  • [10] Learning about science topics of social relevance using lower and higher autonomy-supportive scaffolds
    Schoute, Eric C.
    Bailey, Janelle M.
    Lombardi, Doug
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 78