Software-Defined Networking Approaches for Link Failure Recovery: A Survey

被引:54
作者
Ali, Jehad [1 ]
Lee, Gyu-Min [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Hee [1 ]
Ryu, Dong Kuk [2 ]
Park, Gyudong [2 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Suwon 16499, South Korea
[2] Agcy Def Dev, Seoul 05771, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
software-defined networking; link failure recovery; restoration; resilience; fault-tolerance; SDN; RESTORATION; OPENFLOW; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATIONS; PLANE;
D O I
10.3390/su12104255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deployment of new optimized routing rules on routers are challenging, owing to the tight coupling of the data and control planes and a lack of global topological information. Due to the distributed nature of the traditional classical internet protocol networks, the routing rules and policies are disseminated in a decentralized manner, which causes looping issues during link failure. Software-defined networking (SDN) provides programmability to the network from a central point. Consequently, the nodes or data plane devices in SDN only forward packets and the complexity of the control plane is handed over to the controller. Therefore, the controller installs the rules and policies from a central location. Due to the central control, link failure identification and restoration becomes pliable because the controller has information about the global network topology. Similarly, new optimized rules for link recovery can be deployed from the central point. Herein, we review several schemes for link failure recovery by leveraging SDN while delineating the cons of traditional networking. We also investigate the open research questions posed due to the SDN architecture. This paper also analyzes the proactive and reactive schemes in SDN using the OpenDayLight controller and Mininet, with the simulation of application scenarios from the tactical and data center networks.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [71] A survey: Hybrid SDN
    Sandhya
    Sinha, Yash
    Haribabu, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2017, 100 : 35 - 55
  • [72] Schiff L., 2015, P ACM SIGCOMM S SDN, P1
  • [73] In-Band Synchronization for Distributed SDN Control Planes
    Schiff, Liron
    Schmid, Stefan
    Kuznetsov, Petr
    [J]. ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2016, 46 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [74] Are We Ready for SDN? Implementation Challenges for Software-Defined Networks
    Sezer, Sakir
    Scott-Hayward, Sandra
    Chouhan, Pushpinder Kaur
    Fraser, Barbara
    Lake, David
    Finnegan, Jim
    Viljoen, Niel
    Miller, Marc
    Rao, Navneet
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2013, 51 (07) : 36 - 43
  • [75] Sharma S., 2011, 2011 8th International Workshop on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN 2011), P164, DOI 10.1109/DRCN.2011.6076899
  • [76] Sharma S., 2013, P 2013 9 INT C DES R
  • [77] Sharma S, 2016, IEEE NETWORK, V30, P106, DOI 10.1109/MNET.2016.7389839
  • [78] OpenFlow: Meeting carrier-grade recovery requirements
    Sharma, Sachin
    Staessens, Dimitri
    Colle, Didier
    Pickavet, Mario
    Demeester, Piet
    [J]. COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 36 (06) : 656 - 665
  • [79] Siminesh C.N., 2019, INT J COMPUT NETW CO, V10, P2018
  • [80] A Survey on Software Defined Networking: Architecture for Next Generation Network
    Singh, Sanjeev
    Jha, Rakesh Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 25 (02) : 321 - 374