Software-Defined Networking Approaches for Link Failure Recovery: A Survey

被引:54
作者
Ali, Jehad [1 ]
Lee, Gyu-Min [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-Hee [1 ]
Ryu, Dong Kuk [2 ]
Park, Gyudong [2 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Suwon 16499, South Korea
[2] Agcy Def Dev, Seoul 05771, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
software-defined networking; link failure recovery; restoration; resilience; fault-tolerance; SDN; RESTORATION; OPENFLOW; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATIONS; PLANE;
D O I
10.3390/su12104255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deployment of new optimized routing rules on routers are challenging, owing to the tight coupling of the data and control planes and a lack of global topological information. Due to the distributed nature of the traditional classical internet protocol networks, the routing rules and policies are disseminated in a decentralized manner, which causes looping issues during link failure. Software-defined networking (SDN) provides programmability to the network from a central point. Consequently, the nodes or data plane devices in SDN only forward packets and the complexity of the control plane is handed over to the controller. Therefore, the controller installs the rules and policies from a central location. Due to the central control, link failure identification and restoration becomes pliable because the controller has information about the global network topology. Similarly, new optimized rules for link recovery can be deployed from the central point. Herein, we review several schemes for link failure recovery by leveraging SDN while delineating the cons of traditional networking. We also investigate the open research questions posed due to the SDN architecture. This paper also analyzes the proactive and reactive schemes in SDN using the OpenDayLight controller and Mininet, with the simulation of application scenarios from the tactical and data center networks.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [21] A Survey on Fault Management in Software-Defined Networks
    da Rocha Fonseca, Paulo Cesar
    Mota, Edjard Souza
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2017, 19 (04): : 2284 - 2321
  • [22] Pan-European Optical Transport Networks: An Availability-based Comparison
    Sophie De Maesschalck
    Didier Colle
    Ilse Lievens
    Mario Pickavet
    Piet Demeester
    Christian Mauz
    Monika Jaeger
    Robert Inkret
    Branko Mikac
    Jan Derkacz
    [J]. Photonic Network Communications, 2003, 5 (3) : 203 - 225
  • [23] Dilmaghani R., 2016, P 21 INT COMM CONTR
  • [24] Du P., 2017, P IEEE MIL COMM C MI
  • [25] Francois P., 2007, IEEE T NETW SERV MAN, V4, P2007
  • [26] Understanding Network Failures in Data Centers: Measurement, Analysis, and Implications
    Gill, Phillipa
    Jain, Navendu
    Nagappan, Nachiappan
    [J]. ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2011, 41 (04) : 350 - 361
  • [27] Griffin TG, 1999, COMP COMM R, V29, P277, DOI 10.1145/316194.316231
  • [28] Gyllstrom D, 2014, INT CONF SMART GRID, P254, DOI 10.1109/SmartGridComm.2014.7007655
  • [29] Hakiri, 2015, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
  • [30] HEDRICK C, 1988, RFC1058 RUTG U