Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing

被引:52
作者
Jogunola, Olamide [1 ]
Ikpehai, Augustine [1 ]
Anoh, Kelvin [1 ]
Adebisi, Bamidele [1 ]
Hammoudeh, Mohammad [1 ]
Gacanin, Haris [2 ]
Harris, Georgina [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, England
[2] Nokia Bell Labs, Copernicuslaan 50, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
peer-to-peer architecture (P2P); structured P2P; unstructured P2P; protocols; micro-grid; prosumer; energy trading and sharing (ETS); multi-agent systems; kademlia; gia; COMMUNICATION; SUSTAINABILITY; REQUIREMENTS; INFRASTRUCTURE; MICROGRIDS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/en11010062
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Rising awareness and emergence of smart technologies have inspired new thinking in energy system management. Whilst integration of distributed energy resources in micro-grids (MGs) has become the technique of choice for consumers to generate their energy, it also provides a unique opportunity to explore energy trading and sharing amongst them. This paper investigates peer-to-peer (P2P) communication architectures for prosumers' energy trading and sharing. The performances of common P2P protocols are evaluated under the stringent communication requirements of energy networks defined in IEEE 1547.3-2007. Simulation results show that the structured P2P protocol exhibits a reliability of 99.997% in peer discovery and message delivery whilst the unstructured P2P protocol yields 98%, both of which are consistent with the requirements of MG applications. These two architectures exhibit high scalability with a latency of 0.5 s at a relatively low bandwidth consumption, thus, showing promising potential in their adoption for prosumer to prosumer communication.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Environmental sustainability in the service industry of transportation and logistics service providers: Systematic literature review and research directions [J].
Centobelli, Piera ;
Cerchione, Roberto ;
Esposito, Emilio .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 53 :454-470
[12]   Performance Evaluation of Structured Peer-to-Peer Overlays for Use on Mobile Networks [J].
Chowdhury, Farida ;
Kolberg, Mario .
2013 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN ESYSTEMS ENGINEERING (DESE), 2014, :57-62
[13]   Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Correia, Elisabete ;
Carvalho, Helena ;
Azevedo, Susana G. ;
Govindan, Kannan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (01)
[14]  
Dabek R, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2735, P33
[15]  
De Martini P., 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT
[16]  
Deconinck G., 2008, Architecting Dependable Systems V Lecture Notes in Computer Science, V5135, P101
[17]  
Deconinck G, 2010, CRIT INFR CRIS 2010, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/CRIS.2010.5617536
[18]   A peer-to-peer approach to energy production [J].
Giotitsas, Chris ;
Pazaitis, Alex ;
Kostakis, Vasilis .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2015, 42 :28-38
[19]  
Goh C. Y., 2013, J MULTIMEDIA UBIQUIT, V8, P97, DOI DOI 10.14257/ijmue.2013.8.6.10
[20]   Reviewing Microgrids from a Multi-Agent Systems Perspective [J].
Gomez-Sanz, Jorge J. ;
Garcia-Rodriguez, Sandra ;
Cuartero-Soler, Nuria ;
Hernandez-Callejo, Luis .
ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (05) :3355-3382