Social dominance orientation as an obstacle to intergroup apology

被引:13
作者
Mifune, Nobuhiro [1 ]
Inamasu, Kazunori [2 ]
Kohama, Shoko [3 ]
Ohtsubo, Yohsuke [4 ]
Tago, Atsushi [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Kochi Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Kochi, Kochi, Japan
[2] Kwansei Gakuin Univ, Sch Sociol, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Publ Policy Sch, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Humanities, Dept Psychol, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[5] Waseda Univ, Sch Polit Sci & Econ, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Peace Res Inst Oslo PRIO, Oslo, Norway
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
RECONCILIATION; PERSONALITY; IDEOLOGY; CLOSURE; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0211379
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) has engaged the interest of social and personality psychologists as it has deep implications for the psychology of intergroup conflict, particularly regarding factors such as prejudice and discrimination, as well as international conflict resolution. Nevertheless, few studies have directly assessed how SDO relates to intergroup reconciliation. This study (effective N = 819) measured participants' SDO along with their attitudes toward various governmental apologies to test the hypothesis that SDO is associated with unwillingness to issue intergroup apologies. The results showed that SDO was negatively correlated with supportive attitudes toward government-issued international apologies. This negative correlation remained intact after controlling for the effects of political conservatism and militarism.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
[2]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOCIAL DOMINANCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RIGHTEOUS MIND
[5]   Official Public Apology Effects on Victim Group Members' Evaluations of the Perpetrator Group [J].
Blatz, Craig W. ;
Day, Martin V. ;
Schryer, Emily .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2014, 46 (03) :337-345
[6]   On the Outcomes of Intergroup Apologies: A Review [J].
Blatz, Craig W. ;
Philpot, Catherine .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2010, 4 (11) :995-1007
[7]   Government Apologies for Historical Injustices [J].
Blatz, Craig W. ;
Schumann, Karina ;
Ross, Michael .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 30 (02) :219-241
[8]   THE FREE-RIDER PROBLEM IN INTERGROUP CONFLICTS OVER STEP-LEVEL AND CONTINUOUS PUBLIC-GOODS [J].
BORNSTEIN, G .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (04) :597-606
[9]   What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? [J].
Ekehammar, B ;
Akrami, N ;
Gylje, M ;
Zakrisson, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2004, 18 (06) :463-482
[10]   Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict [J].
Esses, VM ;
Jackson, LM ;
Armstrong, TL .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1998, 54 (04) :699-724