Embodied Choice: How Action Influences Perceptual Decision Making

被引:138
作者
Lepora, Nathan F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pezzulo, Giovanni [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Engn Math, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Robot Lab BRL, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ W England, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[4] CNR, Inst Cognit Sci & Technol, Rome, Italy
关键词
BASAL GANGLIA; MODELS; INFORMATION; ACTIVATION; MECHANISMS; SELECTION; TRACKING; CORTEX; COSTS; LEAKY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004110
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Embodied Choice considers action performance as a proper part of the decision making process rather than merely as a means to report the decision. The central statement of embodied choice is the existence of bidirectional influences between action and decisions. This implies that for a decision expressed by an action, the action dynamics and its constraints (e.g. current trajectory and kinematics) influence the decision making process. Here we use a perceptual decision making task to compare three types of model: a serial decision-then-action model, a parallel decision-and-action model, and an embodied choice model where the action feeds back into the decision making. The embodied model incorporates two key mechanisms that together are lacking in the other models: action preparation and commitment. First, action preparation strategies alleviate delays in enacting a choice but also modify decision termination. Second, action dynamics change the prospects and create a commitment effect to the initially preferred choice. Our results show that these two mechanisms make embodied choice models better suited to combine decision and action appropriately to achieve suitably fast and accurate responses, as usually required in ecologically valid situations. Moreover, embodied choice models with these mechanisms give a better account of trajectory tracking experiments during decision making. In conclusion, the embodied choice framework offers a combined theory of decision and action that gives a clear case that embodied phenomena such as the dynamics of actions can have a causal influence on central cognition.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1966, SENSES CONSIDERED PE
  • [2] Tracking Second Thoughts: Continuous and Discrete Revision Processes during Visual Lexical Decision
    Barca, Laura
    Pezzulo, Giovanni
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [3] Unfolding Visual Lexical Decision in Time
    Barca, Laura
    Pezzulo, Giovanni
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [4] The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions
    Bogacz, Rafal
    Gurney, Kevin
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2007, 19 (02) : 442 - 477
  • [5] The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks
    Bogacz, Rafal
    Brown, Eric
    Moehlis, Jeff
    Holmes, Philip
    Cohen, Jonathan D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (04) : 700 - 765
  • [6] Degree of Certainty Modulates Anticipatory Processes in Real Time
    Bruhn, Pernille
    Huette, Stephanie
    Spivey, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (02) : 525 - 538
  • [7] Motor Effort Alters Changes of Mind in Sensorimotor Decision Making
    Burk, Diana
    Ingram, James N.
    Franklin, David W.
    Shadlen, Michael N.
    Wolpert, Daniel M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [8] Reaching for the unknown: Multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task
    Chapman, Craig S.
    Gallivan, Jason P.
    Wood, Daniel K.
    Milne, Jennifer L.
    Culham, Jody C.
    Goodale, Melvyn A.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2010, 116 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [9] Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action
    Cisek, P
    Kalaska, JF
    [J]. NEURON, 2005, 45 (05) : 801 - 814
  • [10] Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis
    Cisek, Paul
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 362 (1485) : 1585 - 1599