Associative information in memory: Evidence from cued recall

被引:15
|
作者
Aue, William R. [1 ]
Criss, Amy H. [1 ]
Fischetti, Nicholas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Psychol, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cued recall; Episodic memory; Memory models; List discrimination; Associative memory; RECOGNITION MEMORY; TARGET RETRIEVABILITY; PROACTIVE-INHIBITION; WORD-FREQUENCY; MODEL; FAMILIARITY; ITEM; JUDGMENTS; ACCURACY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The representation of item and associative information in episodic memory was investigated using cued recall and single item recognition. In the first four experiments, participants studied two lists constructed such that some items presented in a pair during List 1 were rearranged to create new pairs in List 2 and were accompanied by pairs exclusive to List 2. List 1 was composed of either word-face pairs (Experiment 1 and 3) or word-word and face-face pairs (Experiment 2 and 4). Participants were tested for their memory of the second list containing only word-face pairs. When the test required associative information (i.e., cued recall), interference was specific to pair-type. Specifically, repeating items in the same pair-type across lists led to a greater number of correct and incorrect responses but repeating items in different pair-types did not change performance. When the test did not require associative information (i.e., single item recognition), interference was not specific to pair-type; hits and false alarms were higher for items presented on List 1. In the final experiment, the number of studied pairs and single items was independently manipulated and a pair-specific list length effect was observed. That is, performance in cued recall was modulated by the number of studied pairs, but not the number of studied individual items. Together, these data suggest that information specific to the pair-type (i.e., associative information) is stored and strategically utilized during memory search. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 122
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neural correlates of cued recall with and without retrieval of source memory
    Allan, K
    Rugg, MD
    NEUROREPORT, 1998, 9 (15) : 3463 - 3466
  • [32] Beneficial Effects of Semantic Memory Support on Older Adults' Episodic Memory: Differential Patterns of Support of Item and Associative Information
    Mohanty, Praggyan
    Naveh-Benjamin, Moshe
    Ratneshwar, Srinivasan
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2016, 31 (01) : 25 - 36
  • [33] An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition
    Allan, K
    Rugg, MD
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1997, 35 (04) : 387 - 397
  • [34] Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall
    Jack H. Wilson
    David Kellen
    Amy H. Criss
    Memory & Cognition, 2020, 48 : 51 - 68
  • [35] Associative Memory in Aging: The Effect of Unitization on Source Memory
    Bastin, Christine
    Diana, Rachel A.
    Simon, Jessica
    Collette, Fabienne
    Yonelinas, Andrew P.
    Salmon, Eric
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2013, 28 (01) : 275 - 283
  • [36] Neutral details associated with emotional events are encoded: evidence from a cued recall paradigm
    Steinmetz, Katherine R. Mickley
    Knight, Aubrey G.
    Kensinger, Elizabeth A.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2016, 30 (07) : 1352 - 1360
  • [37] Variability across subjects in free recall versus cued recall
    Mah, Eric Y.
    Lindsay, D. Stephen
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2024, 52 (01) : 23 - 40
  • [38] Familiarity influences on direct and indirect associative memory for objects in scenes
    Ngo, Chi T.
    Lloyd, Marianne E.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (02) : 471 - 482
  • [39] Chaotic neural network for learnable associative memory recall
    Hsu, C
    Szu, H
    INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSES, WAVELETS, AND NEURAL NETWORKS, 2003, 5102 : 258 - 266
  • [40] Does stimulus emotionality influence associative memory? Insights from directed forgetting
    Nie, Aiqing
    Jiang, Guimei
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 40 (10) : 4957 - 4974