Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients

被引:55
作者
Gimbel, JR
Bailey, SM
Tchou, PJ
Ruggieri, PM
Wilkoff, BL
机构
[1] Pk W Hosp, Knoxville, TN USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2005年 / 28卷 / 10期
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker; electromagnetic interference; safety;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00230.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if strategies used to safely scan nonpacemaker dependent patients could be applied to facilitate safe MRI of pacemaker-dependent patients. Interventions: Ten pacemaker-dependent patients underwent a total of 11 MRI scans of the head and neck. Screening, reprogramming VOO or DOO at 60 ppm, and monitoring strategies were used to facilitate MRI. A transmit-receive coil was used and MRI pulse sequences were modified to limit the whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR). Results: All scans proceeded uneventfully. No difficulties in post-MRI telemetry or interrogation were seen and no post-MRI programming changes were noted. No patient experienced arrhythmia or symptoms during or immediately after MRI Battery status remained unchanged, No patient experienced post-MRI change in sensing thresholds. Three patients showed no change in the atrial or ventricular pacing thresholds when the pre-MRI values were compared to the immediate post-MRI values and the 3-month follow-up values. All other patients showed a rise or fall of 0.5 V in their chamber threshold values when the pre-MRI, post-MRI, and 3-month follow-up values were compared. More patients showed a fall in their pacing thresholds than a rise post-MRI. Conclusion: While clearly a higher risk group, like nonpacemaker-dependent patients, MRI might be performed in pacemaker-dependent patients if appropriate pacemaker reprogramming, patient monitoring, and MRI scanning techniques are implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1046
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating
    Baker, KB
    Tkach, JA
    Nyenhuis, JA
    Phillips, M
    Shellock, FG
    Gonzalez-Martinez, J
    Rezai, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (02) : 315 - 320
  • [2] BARTSCH C, 2003, P 19 C INT AC LEG ME, V174, P114
  • [3] Boesiger P., 2004, HERZSCHRITTMACHERTHE, V15, P73
  • [4] Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure
    Bristow, MR
    Saxon, LA
    Boehmer, J
    Krueger, S
    Kass, DA
    De Marco, T
    Carson, P
    DiCarlo, L
    DeMets, D
    White, BG
    DeVries, DW
    Feldman, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (21) : 2140 - 2150
  • [5] Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients?
    Del Ojo, JL
    Moya, F
    Villalba, J
    Sanz, O
    Pavón, R
    Garcia, D
    Pastor, L
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04): : 274 - 278
  • [6] Finelli DA, 2002, AM J NEURORADIOL, V23, P1795
  • [7] Rapid ventricular pacing in a pacemaker patient undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Fontaine, JM
    Mohamed, FB
    Gottlieb, C
    Callans, DJ
    Marchlinski, FE
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (06): : 1336 - 1339
  • [8] Safe sensible, sagacious: responsible scanning of pacemaker patients
    Gimbel, JR
    Wilkoff, BL
    Kanal, E
    Rozner, MA
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (16) : 1683 - 1684
  • [9] Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs)
    Gimbel, JR
    Kanal, E
    Schwartz, KM
    Wilkoff, BL
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04): : 270 - 273
  • [10] Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers
    Gimbel, JR
    Johnson, D
    Levine, PA
    Wilkoff, BL
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (06): : 913 - 919