Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients

被引:55
作者
Gimbel, JR
Bailey, SM
Tchou, PJ
Ruggieri, PM
Wilkoff, BL
机构
[1] Pk W Hosp, Knoxville, TN USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2005年 / 28卷 / 10期
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker; electromagnetic interference; safety;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00230.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if strategies used to safely scan nonpacemaker dependent patients could be applied to facilitate safe MRI of pacemaker-dependent patients. Interventions: Ten pacemaker-dependent patients underwent a total of 11 MRI scans of the head and neck. Screening, reprogramming VOO or DOO at 60 ppm, and monitoring strategies were used to facilitate MRI. A transmit-receive coil was used and MRI pulse sequences were modified to limit the whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR). Results: All scans proceeded uneventfully. No difficulties in post-MRI telemetry or interrogation were seen and no post-MRI programming changes were noted. No patient experienced arrhythmia or symptoms during or immediately after MRI Battery status remained unchanged, No patient experienced post-MRI change in sensing thresholds. Three patients showed no change in the atrial or ventricular pacing thresholds when the pre-MRI values were compared to the immediate post-MRI values and the 3-month follow-up values. All other patients showed a rise or fall of 0.5 V in their chamber threshold values when the pre-MRI, post-MRI, and 3-month follow-up values were compared. More patients showed a fall in their pacing thresholds than a rise post-MRI. Conclusion: While clearly a higher risk group, like nonpacemaker-dependent patients, MRI might be performed in pacemaker-dependent patients if appropriate pacemaker reprogramming, patient monitoring, and MRI scanning techniques are implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1046
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating [J].
Baker, KB ;
Tkach, JA ;
Nyenhuis, JA ;
Phillips, M ;
Shellock, FG ;
Gonzalez-Martinez, J ;
Rezai, AR .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (02) :315-320
[2]  
BARTSCH C, 2003, P 19 C INT AC LEG ME, V174, P114
[3]  
Boesiger P., 2004, HERZSCHRITTMACHERTHE, V15, P73
[4]   Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure [J].
Bristow, MR ;
Saxon, LA ;
Boehmer, J ;
Krueger, S ;
Kass, DA ;
De Marco, T ;
Carson, P ;
DiCarlo, L ;
DeMets, D ;
White, BG ;
DeVries, DW ;
Feldman, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (21) :2140-2150
[5]   Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients? [J].
Del Ojo, JL ;
Moya, F ;
Villalba, J ;
Sanz, O ;
Pavón, R ;
Garcia, D ;
Pastor, L .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04) :274-278
[6]  
Finelli DA, 2002, AM J NEURORADIOL, V23, P1795
[7]   Rapid ventricular pacing in a pacemaker patient undergoing magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Fontaine, JM ;
Mohamed, FB ;
Gottlieb, C ;
Callans, DJ ;
Marchlinski, FE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (06) :1336-1339
[8]   Safe sensible, sagacious: responsible scanning of pacemaker patients [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Wilkoff, BL ;
Kanal, E ;
Rozner, MA .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (16) :1683-1684
[9]   Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Kanal, E ;
Schwartz, KM ;
Wilkoff, BL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04) :270-273
[10]   Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Johnson, D ;
Levine, PA ;
Wilkoff, BL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (06) :913-919