The effect of participation in a mobility clinic on self-reported mobility and quality of life in people with lower limb amputation: A pilot study

被引:4
作者
Anderson, Sarah [1 ]
Ridgewell, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Dillon, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Kingsbury Dr, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Australian Orthot Prosthet Assoc, Camberwell, Vic, Australia
关键词
Quality of life; mobility; clinic; amputation; SF-36; PLUS-M; HEALTH SURVEY SF-36; PLUS-M; USERS SURVEY; VALIDITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1177/0309364620921749
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many people with lower limb amputation experience mobility impairment and reduced quality of life. Mobility clinics are designed to improve mobility and quality of life for people with lower limb amputation, but their effectiveness is unknown. Objectives: To compare changes in mobility prior to, and 12 weeks following participation in mobility clinic for people with lower limb amputation, and to explain whether changes in mobility explained changes in quality of life. To determine whether the PLUS-M (TM) was sensitive to the effects of participation in the mobility clinic, and to estimate the sample size required for a definitive study. Study design: Longitudinal observational. Methods: Electronic versions of the PLUS-M and SF-36v2(R) were completed by people living in the community with lower limb amputation prior to, and 12 weeks following participation in a mobility clinic. Results: There was a significant increase in mobility from baseline to 12 weeks post participation in the clinic (p = 0.012). Changes in mobility explained a significant proportion of variance in the SF-36v2 mental component summary (p = 0.024) but not the physical component summary (p = 0.804). Conclusion: For people with lower limb amputation, mobility increased after participation in the clinic and this explained improvements in SF-36v2 mental component summary. The PLUS-M was sensitive enough to detect a change in mobility over time.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 207
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Quality of life and functionality after lower limb amputations: comparison between uni- vs. bilateral amputee patients
    Akarsu, Selim
    Tekin, Levent
    Safaz, Ismail
    Goktepe, Ahmet Salim
    Yazicioglu, Kamil
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 37 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [2] Amtmann D, 2014, QUAL LIFE RES, V23, P39
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) Version 1.2
  • [4] VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE
    BRAZIER, JE
    HARPER, R
    JONES, NMB
    OCATHAIN, A
    THOMAS, KJ
    USHERWOOD, T
    WESTLAKE, L
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846): : 160 - 164
  • [5] Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation
    Davies, B
    Datta, D
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 27 (03) : 186 - 190
  • [6] Government of South Australia, 2016, GUID TREATM CAR SUPP
  • [7] Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications
    Hafner, Brian J.
    Morgan, Sara J.
    Askew, Robert L.
    Salem, Rana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 53 (06) : 797 - 811
  • [8] Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation
    Hafner, Brian J.
    Gaunaurd, Ignacio A.
    Morgan, Sara J.
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Salem, Rana
    Gailey, Robert S.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 98 (02): : 277 - 285
  • [9] Characterizing mobility from the prosthetic limb user's perspective: Use of focus groups to guide development of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility
    Hafner, Brian J.
    Morgan, Sara J.
    Abrahamson, Daniel C.
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    [J]. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 40 (05) : 582 - 590
  • [10] Lund A., 2015, ONE WAY REPEATED MEA