Electrophysiological assessments of cognition and sensory processing in TBI: Applications for diagnosis, prognosis and rehabilitation

被引:46
作者
Folmer, Robert L. [1 ,2 ]
Billings, Curtis J. [1 ,2 ]
Diedesch-Rouse, Anna C. [1 ]
Gallun, Frederick J. [1 ,2 ]
Lew, Henry L. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Portland VA Med Ctr, NCRAR, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] DVBIC, Rockville, MD USA
[4] VCU, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
Event-related potentials; Evoked potentials; EP; ERP; TBI; Traumatic brain injury; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS; CLOSED-HEAD-INJURY; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; TEMPORAL-PARIETAL LESIONS; AUDITORY ODDBALL TASK; SUBJECTS OWN NAME; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; COMATOSE PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Traumatic brain injuries are often associated with damage to sensory and cognitive processing pathways. Because evoked potentials (EPs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) are generated by neuronal activity, they are useful for assessing the integrity of neural processing capabilities in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This review of somatosensory, auditory and visual ERPs in assessments of TBI patients is provided with the hope that it will be of interest to clinicians and researchers who conduct or interpret electrophysiological evaluations of this population. Because this article reviews ERP studies conducted in three different sensory modalities, involving patients with a wide range of TBI severity ratings and circumstances, it is difficult to provide a coherent summary of findings. However, some general trends emerge that give rise to the following observations and recommendations: 1) bilateral absence of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) is often associated with poor clinical prognosis and outcome; 2) the presence of normal ERPs does not guarantee favorable outcome; 3) ERPs evoked by a variety of sensory stimuli should be used to evaluate TBI patients, especially those with severe injuries; 4) time since onset of injury should be taken into account when conducting ERP evaluations of TBI patients or interpreting results; 5) because sensory deficits (e.g., vision impairment or hearing loss) affect ERP results, tests of peripheral sensory integrity should be conducted in conjunction with ERP recordings; and 6) patients' state of consciousness, physical and cognitive abilities to respond and follow directions should be considered when conducting or interpreting ERP evaluations. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 15
页数:12
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Event-related potentials in posttraumatic headache [J].
Alberti, A ;
Sarchielli, P ;
Mazzotta, G ;
Gallai, V .
HEADACHE, 2001, 41 (06) :579-585
[2]   Impaired auditory gating and P50 nonsuppression following traumatic brain injury [J].
Arciniegas, D ;
Olincy, A ;
Topkoff, J ;
McRae, K ;
Cawthra, E ;
Filley, CM ;
Reite, M ;
Adler, LE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2000, 12 (01) :77-85
[3]   Does wave VI of BAEP pertain to the prognosis of coma? [J].
Balogh, A ;
Wedekind, C ;
Klug, N .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 31 (06) :406-411
[4]   Event-related potentials indicate bi-hemispherical changes in speech sound processing during aphasia rehabilitation [J].
Becker, Frank ;
Reinvang, Ivar .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2007, 39 (08) :658-661
[5]  
Butinar Dusan, 1996, Pfluegers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, V431, pR289, DOI 10.1007/BF02346382
[6]   N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: Disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1 [J].
Campbell, Tom ;
Winkler, Istvan ;
Kujala, Teija .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (04) :530-540
[7]   THE ASSESSMENT OF SEVERE HEAD-INJURY BY SHORT-LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY AND BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS [J].
CANT, BR ;
HUME, AL ;
JUDSON, JA ;
SHAW, NA .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 65 (03) :188-195
[8]   Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review [J].
Carter, BG ;
Butt, W .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (06) :765-775
[9]  
Chen Xi-Ping, 2006, Neurosci Bull, V22, P165
[10]  
Chiappa K. H., 1997, EVOKED POTENTIALS CL