Global university rankings - a comparative analysis

被引:33
作者
Pavel, Adina-Petruta [1 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Inst Doctoral Studies, Business Adm Field, Bucharest, Romania
来源
4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (WCBEM-2015) | 2015年 / 26卷
关键词
global outlook; research; higher education; reputation; innovation;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Over the last years, the global university rankings appeared in order to measure the performances of higher education institutions from all over the word after some pre-established indicators. The rankings make it possible to evaluate complex information according to various combinations of various factors. In this paper, I described and analyzed three of the most known, influential and widely observed international university rankings, in order to identify the similitudes and especially the differences between them regarding the methodology, criteria and weights, top universities, research and educational process or the global outlook, using the public and available information from their web-sites. Also, I want to see the impact of these rankings and how they influence the stakeholders, which are winners of each of these global university rankings, from want countries or regions. Global university rankings tend to focus more on the research area and less on teaching and learning environment. After the results of these rankings and others, all universities whether small or large, can improve practices that will make them stronger. For the contemporary society it is also important for a university to be able to innovate and help industry and businesses with consultancy and innovations. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach [J].
Daraio, Cinzia ;
Bonaccorsi, Andrea ;
Simar, Leopold .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 244 (03) :918-930
[42]   International University Rankings - A Critical Review of the Methodology [J].
Kroth, Anna ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERZIEHUNGSWISSENSCHAFT, 2008, 11 (04) :542-558
[43]   University rankings and sustainable development: the state of the art [J].
Leal Filho, Walter ;
Viera Trevisan, Lais ;
Wahaj, Zujaja ;
Deda Araujo Nunes, Denner ;
Ruy Portela de Vasconcelos, Claudio ;
Aparecida Dibbern, Thais ;
Ruiz Vargas, Valeria ;
Iyer-Raniga, Usha ;
Anholon, Rosley ;
Novikau, Aliaksandr ;
Rimi Abubakar, Ismaila ;
Pimenta Dinis, Maria Alzira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024,
[44]   University rankings: What do they really show? [J].
Johnes, Jill .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (01) :585-606
[45]   University rankings: What do they really show? [J].
Jill Johnes .
Scientometrics, 2018, 115 :585-606
[46]   Cultural Difference: Can It Influence University Rankings? [J].
Lv Mingxia .
2017 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES SYSTEMS AND SERVICES MANAGEMENT (ICSSSM), 2017,
[47]   A data analytics approach for university competitiveness: the QS world university rankings [J].
Carmen Estrada-Real, Ana ;
Cantu-Ortiz, Francisco J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2022, 16 (03) :871-891
[48]   A data analytics approach for university competitiveness: the QS world university rankings [J].
Ana Carmen Estrada-Real ;
Francisco J. Cantu-Ortiz .
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2022, 16 :871-891
[49]   An empirical model of university competitiveness and rankings: The effects of entrepreneurial behaviors and dynamic capabilities [J].
Liao, Ying-Kai ;
Suprapto, Ridhotullah Rezki Maulana .
ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 29 (01) :34-43
[50]   National university rankings based on open data: A case study from Serbia [J].
Ivancevic, Vladimir ;
Lukovic, Ivan .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KES-2018), 2018, 126 :1516-1525