Global university rankings - a comparative analysis

被引:33
作者
Pavel, Adina-Petruta [1 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Inst Doctoral Studies, Business Adm Field, Bucharest, Romania
来源
4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (WCBEM-2015) | 2015年 / 26卷
关键词
global outlook; research; higher education; reputation; innovation;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Over the last years, the global university rankings appeared in order to measure the performances of higher education institutions from all over the word after some pre-established indicators. The rankings make it possible to evaluate complex information according to various combinations of various factors. In this paper, I described and analyzed three of the most known, influential and widely observed international university rankings, in order to identify the similitudes and especially the differences between them regarding the methodology, criteria and weights, top universities, research and educational process or the global outlook, using the public and available information from their web-sites. Also, I want to see the impact of these rankings and how they influence the stakeholders, which are winners of each of these global university rankings, from want countries or regions. Global university rankings tend to focus more on the research area and less on teaching and learning environment. After the results of these rankings and others, all universities whether small or large, can improve practices that will make them stronger. For the contemporary society it is also important for a university to be able to innovate and help industry and businesses with consultancy and innovations. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Global university rankings as 'sticky' objects and 'refrains': affect and mediatisation in India [J].
Shahjahan, Riyad A. ;
Bylsma, Paul E. ;
Singai, Chetan .
COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2022, 58 (02) :224-241
[22]   Global university rankings and strategic planning: a case study of Australian institutional performance [J].
Dowsett, Leah .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 42 (04) :478-494
[23]   'Governments base performance-based funding on global rankings indicators': A global trend in higher education finance or a global rankings literature fiction? A comparative analysis of four performance-based funding programs [J].
Adam, Edmund .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 76
[24]   HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN IN THE LIGHT OF NATIONAL AND GLOBAL UNIVERSITY RANKINGS [J].
Kim, Maxim Yu. ;
Troitskiy, Evgeny F. .
TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2016, (411) :64-68
[25]   Sensitivity of university rankings: implications of stochastic dominance efficiency analysis [J].
Pinar, Mehmet ;
Milla, Joniada ;
Stengos, Thanasis .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2019, 27 (01) :75-92
[26]   Globalising or assimilating? Exploring the contemporary function of regionalised global university rankings in Latin America [J].
Darwin, Stephen ;
Barahona, Malba .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 87 (02) :287-304
[27]   University rankings disclosure and efficiency in higher education: A bibliometric and systematic analysis [J].
Ramirez-Gutierrez, Zoraida ;
Barrachina-Palanca, Mercedes ;
Mateo Ripoll-Feliu, Vicente .
REVISTA DE EDUCACION, 2019, (384) :247-286
[28]   University rankings in action? The importance of rankings and an excellence competition for university choice of high-ability students [J].
Horstschraeer, Julia .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2012, 31 (06) :1162-1176
[29]   What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity [J].
Vicente Safón .
Scientometrics, 2013, 97 :223-244
[30]   What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity [J].
Safon, Vicente .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 97 (02) :223-244