Comparison of clinically indicated replacement and routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
作者
Chen, Ching-Yi [1 ]
Chen, Wang-Chun [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Jung-Yueh [4 ,5 ]
Lai, Chih-Cheng [6 ]
Wei, Yu-Feng [3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Pharm, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, Inst Biotechnol & Chem Engn, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] E Da Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Div Hosp Med, Dept Internal Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] E Da Canc Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[8] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med Int Students, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
catheter-related infection; peripheral intravenous catheter; PIVC; phlebitis; routine replacement; clinically indicated replacement; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.964096
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: It is unknown whether clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) increases the risks of PIVC-associated complications and infections compared to routine replacement of PIVCs. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the safety outcomes of routine replacement and clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs were included for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of phlebitis, and secondary outcomes included the risks of occlusion, local infection, infiltration, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and accidental removal of the PIVC. Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 10 973 patients were included in this meta-analysis, of whom 5,546 and 5,527 were assigned to the study group (clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs) and control group (routine replacement of PIVCs every 72-96 h), respectively. The incidence of phlebitis in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group [risk ratio (RR), 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.44, P = 0.04, I-2 = 49%]. In addition, the study group was associated with a higher risk of occlusion (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01, I-2 = 82%) and infiltration (fluid leaks) (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.53, P = 0.01, I-2 = 72%) than the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in the risks of local infection (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.38-8.16, P = 0.48, I-2 = 0%) and CRBSI (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.08-4.68, P = 0.64, I-2 = 0%) between the study and control groups. Conclusion: The clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs may increase the risks of PIVC-associated phlebitis, infiltration, and occlusion compared to the routine replacement of PIVCs, but did not increase the risk of PIVC-associated infections. Based on these findings, routine replacement of PIVCs every 72-96 h maybe a preferred option than clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs.Systematic review registration[], identifier [CRD42022302021].
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] Nishanth S, 2009, NATL MED J INDIA, V22, P60
  • [12] O'Grady NP, 2011, CLIN INFECT DIS, V52, pE162, DOI [10.1093/cid/cir257, 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003]
  • [13] The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
    Page, Matthew J.
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Hoffmann, Tammy C.
    Mulrow, Cynthia D.
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer M.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Chou, Roger
    Glanville, Julie
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Li, Tianjing
    Loder, Elizabeth W.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    McDonald, Steve
    McGuinness, Luke A.
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Thomas, James
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Whiting, Penny
    Moher, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 134 : 178 - 189
  • [14] Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial
    Rickard, Claire M.
    Webster, Joan
    Wallis, Marianne C.
    Marsh, Nicole
    McGrail, Matthew R.
    French, Venessa
    Foster, Lynelle
    Gallagher, Peter
    Gowardman, John R.
    Zhang, Li
    McClymont, Alice
    Whitby, Michael
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 380 (9847) : 1066 - 1074
  • [15] Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial
    Rickard, Claire M.
    McCann, Damhnat
    Munnings, Jane
    McGrail, Matthew R.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8
  • [16] Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team - A randomized controlled trial
    Soifer, NE
    Borzak, S
    Edlin, BR
    Weinstein, RA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [17] Routine Replacement versus Clinical Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in a Regional Hospital in the Home Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Van Donk, Patricia
    Rickard, Claire M.
    McGrail, Matthew R.
    Doolan, Glenn
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (09) : 915 - 917
  • [18] The RESPECT trial-Replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters according to clinical reasons or every 96 hours: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Vendramim, P.
    Avelar, A. F. M.
    Rickard, C. M.
    Pedreira, M. D. L. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 107
  • [19] Intravenous therapy
    Waitt, C
    Waitt, P
    Pirmohamed, M
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 80 (939) : 1 - 6
  • [20] Developing a Research base for Intravenous Peripheral cannula re-sites (DRIP trial). A randomised controlled trial of hospital in-patients
    Webster, Joan
    Lloyd, Sophia
    Hopkins, Tracey
    Osborne, Sonya
    Yaxley, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2007, 44 (05) : 664 - 671