The Accurate Measurement of Students' Learning in E-Learning Environments

被引:2
作者
Lee, Sunbok [1 ]
Choi, Youn-Jeng [1 ]
Kim, Hyun-Song [2 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Educ, Seoul 03760, South Korea
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Teaching & Learning Technol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 21期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
massive open online courses; equating; common metric; fixed-parameter calibration; item response theory; ITEM;
D O I
10.3390/app11219946
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The ultimate goal of E-learning environments is to improve students' learning. To achieve that goal, it is crucial to accurately measure students' learning. In the field of educational measurement, it is well known that the key issue in the measurement of learning is to place test scores on a common metric. Despite the crucial role of a common metric in the measurement of learning, however, less attention has been paid to this important issue in E-learning studies. In this study, we propose to use fixed-parameter calibration (FPC) in an item response theory (IRT) framework to set up a common metric in E-learning environments. To demonstrate FPC, we used the data from the MOOC "Introduction to Psychology as a Science " offered through Coursera collaboratively by Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT) and Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in 2013. Our analysis showed that the students' learning gains were substantially different with and without FPC.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alario-Hoyos C, 2017, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V18, P119
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P 2 2015 ACM C LEARN, DOI DOI 10.1145/2724660.2724681
[3]   A comparative study of on-line pretest item - Calibration/scaling methods in computerized adaptive testing [J].
Ban, JC ;
Hanson, BA ;
Wang, TY ;
Yi, Q ;
Harris, DJ .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 38 (03) :191-212
[4]  
Bergner Y., 2015, P 5 INT C LEARN AN K, DOI [10.1145/2723576.2723582, DOI 10.1145/2723576.2723582]
[5]  
Cook L.L., 1991, ED MEASUREMENT, V10, P37, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00207.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1991.TB00207.X]
[6]  
De Ayala R.J., 2013, The theory and practice of item response theory
[7]   The role of students' motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC [J].
de Barba, P. G. ;
Kennedy, G. E. ;
Ainley, M. D. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2016, 32 (03) :218-231
[8]  
Dugard P., 1995, Educational Psychology, V15, P181, DOI [10.1080/0144341950150207, DOI 10.1080/0144341950150207]
[9]  
Embretson S. E., 2000, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410605269
[10]  
Hambleton RK, 1993, Educ Meas, V12, P38, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1993.TB00543.X]