Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study

被引:17
作者
Rizvi, Rubina F. [1 ]
Marquard, Jenna L. [2 ]
Hultman, Gretchen M. [1 ]
Adam, Terrence J. [1 ,3 ]
Harder, Kathleen A. [1 ,4 ]
Melton, Genevieve B. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Inst Hlth Informat, 420 Delaware St SE,Mayo Mail Code 450, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Ind Engn, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Coll Design, Ctr Design & Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, 420 Delaware St SE,Mayo Mail Code 450, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2017年 / 8卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
electronic health records; interfaces; usability; graphical user interface; clinical documentation; qualitative; methodology; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; CARE; PHYSICIANS; ENTRY; EHR; DESIGN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4338/ACI-2017-04-RA-0067
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A substantial gap exists between current Electronic Health Record (EHR) usability and potential optimal usability. One of the fundamental reasons for this discrepancy is poor incorporation of a User-Centered Design (UCD) approach during the Graphical User Interface (GUI) development process. Objective To evaluate usability strengths and weaknesses of two widely implemented EHR GUIs for critical clinical notes usage tasks. Methods Twelve Internal Medicine resident physicians interacting with one of the two EHR systems (System-1 at Location-A and System-2 at Location-B) were observed by two usability evaluators employing an ethnographic approach. User comments and observer findings were analyzed for two critical tasks: (1) clinical notes entry and (2) related information-seeking tasks. Data were analyzed from two standpoints: (1) usability references categorized by usability evaluators as positive, negative, or equivocal and (2) usability impact of each feature measured through a 7-point severity rating scale. Findings were also validated by user responses to a post observation questionnaire. Results For clinical notes entry, System-1 surpassed System-2 with more positive (26% vs. 12%) than negative (12% vs. 34%) usability references. Greatest impact features on EHR usability (severity score pertaining to each feature) for clinical notes entry were: autopopulation (6), screen options (5.5), communication (5), copy pasting (4.5), error prevention (4.5), edit ability (4), and dictation and transcription (3.5). Both systems performed equally well on information-seeking tasks and features with greatest impacts on EHRusability were navigation for notes (7) and others (e.g., looking for ancillary data; 5.5). Ethnographic observations were supported by follow-up questionnaire responses. Conclusion This study provides usability-specific insights to inform future, improved, EHR interface that is better aligned with UCD approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1105
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Altheide D.L., 1987, QUAL SOCIOL, V10, P65, DOI [10.1007/BF00988269, DOI 10.1007/BF00988269, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, QUALITATIVE RES METH
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, 9241111998 ISO, P22
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, USABILITY INSPECTION
  • [5] Barnum CM., 2010, USABILITY TESTING ES
  • [6] Baxter K, 2015, UNDERSTANDING YOUR USERS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO USER RESEARCH METHODS, 2ND EDITION, P1
  • [8] What Do Physicians Read (and Ignore) in Electronic Progress Notes?
    Brown, P. J.
    Marquard, J. L.
    Amster, B.
    Romoser, M.
    Friderici, J.
    Goff, S.
    Fisher, D.
    [J]. APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 5 (02): : 430 - 444
  • [9] The Benefits Of Health Information Technology: A Review Of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results
    Buntin, Melinda Beeuwkes
    Burke, Matthew F.
    Hoaglin, Michael C.
    Blumenthal, David
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2011, 30 (03) : 464 - 471
  • [10] ICU nurses' acceptance of electronic health records
    Carayon, Pascale
    Cartmill, Randi
    Blosky, Mary Ann
    Brown, Roger
    Hackenberg, Matthew
    Hoonakker, Peter
    Hundt, Ann Schoofs
    Norfolk, Evan
    Wetterneck, Tosha B.
    Walker, James M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 18 (06) : 812 - 819