Outcome analysis of immediately placed, immediately restored implants in the esthetic area: The clinical relevance of different interimplant distances

被引:25
作者
Degidi, Marco
Novaes, Arthur Belem, Jr. [1 ]
Nardi, Diego
Piattelli, Adriano [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Buccomaxillofacial Surg & Traumatol & Period, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Sch Dent, Chieti, Italy
关键词
dental implants; gingival recession; osseointegration;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2008.070534
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate bone and soft tissue levels between immediately placed, immediately restored implants positioned in the esthetic anterior region with different interimplant distances (IID). Methods: Forty-nine patients requiring multiple implant restorations in the anterior regions received 152 implants, which were restored immediately. Periapical radiographs and digital images of 99 interimplant sites were taken at the regular follow-up examinations at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. They were digitally recorded and analyzed. The presence of the interproximal papilla was assessed and compared to the distances between the bone crest and the contact point between the natural teeth and the restoration crowns. Results: Implants with an IID <2 mm seemed to lose less bone laterally. When the IID was <2 mm, vertical crestal bone loss was significantly greater than in the group with IID >4 mm. The percentage of the interproximal papilla presence decreased when the distance between the bone crest and the contact point between the two restoration crowns was >6 mm and when two implants were placed at a distance >= 4 mm. Conclusions: To guarantee a better esthetic result in immediately placed, immediately restored implants, the contact point between the two prosthetic crowns should be placed at 3 to 4 mm, and never >6 mm, from the bone peak. Two adjacent implants should be placed at a distance >2 and <4 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1061
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   SOFT-TISSUE REACTIONS TO NON-SUBMERGED UNLOADED TITANIUM IMPLANTS IN BEAGLE DOGS [J].
BUSER, D ;
WEBER, HP ;
DONATH, K ;
FIORELLINI, JP ;
PAQUETTE, DW ;
WILLIAMS, RC .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1992, 63 (03) :225-236
[2]   Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region [J].
Choquet, V ;
Hermans, M ;
Adriaenssens, P ;
Daelemans, P ;
Tarnow, DP ;
Malevez, C .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (10) :1364-1371
[3]   Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible [J].
Cochran, DL ;
Hermann, JS ;
Schenk, RK ;
Higginbottom, FL ;
Buser, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (02) :186-197
[4]   Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla [J].
Gastaldo, JF ;
Cury, PR ;
Sendyk, WR .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (09) :1242-1246
[5]  
Henriksson Kristina, 2004, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V6, P181
[6]   Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible [J].
Hermann, JS ;
Cochran, DL ;
Nummikoski, PV ;
Buser, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (11) :1117-1130
[7]  
Jaffin RA, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P187
[8]  
Jemt T, 1997, INT J PERIODONT REST, V17, P327
[9]  
Kupershmidt I, 2007, J PERIODONTOL, V78, P991, DOI 10.1902/jop.2007.060443
[10]   THE BIOLOGIC RESPONSE TO THE SINGLE-CRYSTAL SAPPHIRE ENDOSTEAL DENTAL IMPLANT - SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS [J].
MCKINNEY, RV ;
STEFLIK, DE ;
KOTH, DL .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 51 (03) :372-379