Impact of Living Conditions on Online Education: Evidence from China

被引:7
作者
Gu, Jiafeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Inst Social Sci Survey, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
online education; living conditions; semiprivate space; COVID-19; pandemic; China; DESIGNER JUDGMENTS; DIFFERENTIATION; PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS; SUPPORT; SCIENCE; GENDER; ACCESS; HEALTH; INCOME;
D O I
10.3390/su14063231
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Students need to maintain certain living conditions in order to pursue online learning at home. However, there is a lack of a scientific explanation for the extent to which students' performance in online at-home education is influenced by living conditions. Students from 2002 low-income households in China were surveyed, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted in order to explore the impact of living conditions on online education. The results showed that, rather than computers and smartphones, broadband Internet at home can affect students' performance in online learning. The larger the residence area, the better the children's performance in at-home e-learning. Moreover, children living in dilapidated houses are unable to satisfactorily perform in an e-learning environment. Contrarily, children who live in families with separate rooms and tap water show better performances. Additionally, the performance will be worse in the case of unattended students. Furthermore, children from low-income and -status families in the community are often at a disadvantage in an at-home e-learning environment. Cognition regarding the connection between living conditions and online education can be crucial for the improvement of the living conditions of low-income families in order to achieve online education equity.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 88 条
[41]   Narratives of online education in India: issues of equity, inclusion, and diversity [J].
Jaggi, Ruchi .
JOURNAL OF CHILDREN AND MEDIA, 2021, 15 (01) :55-59
[42]  
Janardhana N, 2015, J Nat Sci Biol Med, V6, P7, DOI 10.4103/0976-9668.149070
[43]  
Jeske Debora, 2014, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, V25, P509
[44]   A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces [J].
Jung, Insung ;
Latchem, Colin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (01) :6-18
[45]   The wealth of reality: An ecology of composition [J].
Killingsworth, MJ .
COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION, 2000, 52 (02) :308-311
[46]  
Lander D.A., 2005, Studies in Continuing Education, V27, P155, DOI DOI 10.1080/01580370500202331
[47]  
Lee Y, 2018, ASIA LIFE SCI, V2, P113, DOI [10.21742/ijcwpm.2018.2.2.19, DOI 10.21742/IJCWPM.2018.2.2.19]
[48]   A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research [J].
Lee, Youngju ;
Choi, Jaeho .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 59 (05) :593-618
[49]  
Lefebvre Henri, 1991, The Production of Social Space
[50]   Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning [J].
Lehmann, Thomas ;
Haehnlein, Inka ;
Ifenthaler, Dirk .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 32 :313-323