Comparison study between induced and spontaneous term and preterm births of small-for-gestational-age neonates

被引:34
作者
Hershkovitz, R
Erez, O
Sheiner, E
Bashiri, A
Furman, B
Shoham-Vardi, I
Mazor, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Soroka Univ Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Soroka Univ Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
small-for-gestational-age; induction of labor; IUGR; preterm birth; term delivery;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00517-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare perinatal and maternal outcome between induced and spontaneous small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates at term and preterm deliveries. Study design: A cross-sectional study was designed and two groups were identified at each gestational age: study group-SGA neonates born after induction of labor, comparison group-SGA neonates born after spontaneous onset of labor. SGA was decoded as birth weight below 10th percentile. The population consisted of 367 consecutive SGA singleton preterm neonates (24-36 weeks' gestation) and 3921 term SGA neonates (37-42 weeks' gestation) delivered between 1990 and 1997. Patients with antepartum death and congenital anomalies were excluded from this study. Results: The prevalence of SGA neonates among preterm deliveries was significantly higher than among term deliveries (9.3 versus 6.1%, P < 0.001). The rate of induction of labor among preterm SGA deliveries was significantly higher than term SGA deliveries (17.7 versus 13.4%, P = 0.002). The rates hypertensive disorders, suspected IUGR, placental abruption, cesarean section, chorioamnionitis and endometritis were significantly higher among preterm SGA than in term SGA. A multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that suspected IUGR, severe PIH (but not mild PIH), chronic hypertension and placental abruption were independent risk factors for induction of labor among preterm SGA neonates. In addition to these factors, oligohydramnios was considered to be an independent risk factor only among term SGA. No significant differences were found in the mean birthweight and post-partum death rates between the induced and spontaneous preterm and term SGA. The incidence of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min was significantly lower only among induced term SGA. Conclusions: Induction of labor in preterm SGA neonates is performed mainly due to maternal severe hypertension disorders. The indications for induction of labor among term SGA include maternal hypertensive disorders (mild or severe) as well as neonatal status, represented mainly by oligohydramnios. In addition, induction of labor in preterm or term SGA neonates does not change neonatal outcome. Moreover, since no evidence of improved neonatal outcome was demonstrated in either indicated group, preterm or term, the question of timing and indications for induction of labor should be discussed. 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New Option in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) Allows for the Conversion of Prevalence of Small-for-Gestational-Age and Preterm Births to Prevalence of Low Birth Weight
    Kozuki, Naoko
    Katz, Joanne
    Clermont, Adrienne
    Walker, Neff
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2017, 147 (11) : 2141S - 2146S
  • [42] Induced abortion and risk of small-for-gestational-age birth
    Parazzini, F.
    Cipriani, S.
    Chiaffarino, F.
    Sandretti, F.
    Bortolus, R.
    Chiantera, V.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (11) : 1414 - 1418
  • [43] EFFECT OF HYPERTENSIVE DISEASES IN PREGNANCY ON BIRTH-WEIGHT, GESTATIONAL DURATION, AND SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE BIRTHS
    ANANTH, CV
    PEEDICAYIL, A
    SAVITZ, DA
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (04) : 391 - 395
  • [44] The association of cerebral palsy and death with small-for-gestational-age birthweight in preterm neonates by individualized and population-based percentiles
    Grobman, William A.
    Lai, Yinglei
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Malone, Fergal D.
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Hankins, Gary D. V.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (04)
  • [45] Neonatal morbidity in late preterm small for gestational age neonates
    Bartal, Michal Fishel
    Chen, Han-Yang
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (19) : 3208 - 3213
  • [46] Maternal plasma miRNAs as potential biomarkers for detecting risk of small-for-gestational-age births
    Kim, Sung Hye
    MacIntyre, David A.
    Binkhamis, Reem
    Cook, Joanna
    Sykes, Lynne
    Bennett, Phillip R.
    Terzidou, Vasso
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2020, 62
  • [47] Intrauterine growth pattern by the tendency to repeat small-for-gestational-age births in successive pregnancies
    Bakketeig, LS
    Hoffman, HJ
    Jacobsen, G
    Hagen, JA
    Storvik, BE
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 76 : 3 - 7
  • [48] Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE
    Tan, M. Y.
    Poon, L. C.
    Rolnik, D. L.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Matallana, C. De Paco
    Akolekar, R.
    Cicero, S.
    Janga, D.
    Singh, M.
    Molina, F. S.
    Persico, N.
    Jani, J. C.
    Plasencia, W.
    Greco, E.
    Papaioannou, G.
    Wright, D.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [49] Small-for-Gestational Age and Preterm Birth Across Generations: A Population-Based Study of Illinois Births
    Castrillio, Stephanie M.
    Rankin, Kristin M.
    David, Richard J.
    Collins, James W., Jr.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2014, 18 (10) : 2456 - 2464
  • [50] Does being born small-for-gestational-age affect cerebellar size in neonates?
    Imamoglu, Ebru Yalin
    Gursoy, Tugba
    Sancak, Selim
    Ovali, Fahri
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (06) : 892 - 896